말하기 숙달도 평가에 관한 논평

• 영문명: Reexamination of ACTFL OPI
• 발행기관: 국제한국어교육학회
• 저자명: 윤은경
• 간행물 정보: 『한국어교육』19권 1호, 1~25쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 한국어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.04.30

영문 초록

The use of the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines and Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) has been widespread for language testing even though they have been criticized by researchers of second language acquisition and testing since their genesis in 1982. Much of this criticism has focused on reliability and validity for the OPI. In light of this, the purpose of this paper to identify the criticism on the oral proficiency interview and to provide recommendations for other proficiency test areas of future study. This paper presents (1) an overview of research carried out on the ACTFL OPI and Guidelines, (2) a summary of the criticism leveled against them and discussions on other points of view over the criticism learned from research, and (3) recommendations such as interrater reliability, raters’ training session, elicitation process, comparison with other oral proficiency test, analytic assessment, oral proficiency interview for multi-purposes for further research.

목차

1. 서론

2. OPI의 소개

3. OPI의 비평에 관한 재검토

4. 한국어 말하기 능력 평가를 위한 제안

5. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

말하기 평가 ACTFL OPI 구인타당도 채점자간신뢰도 speaking test Oral Proficiency Interview construct validity interrater reliability