영화 <요리사, 도둑, 그의 아내 그리고 그녀의 정부>에 의해서 환기된 혐오반응

• 영문명: Revulsion Response Evoked by The Film 'The Cook The Thief His Wife and Her Lover': Comparative Studies on Cognitive Perspective of Aristotle, Freud and Girard
• 발행기관: 한국영화학회
• 저자명: 김성범 박연경
• 간행물 정보: 『영화연구』제62호, 5~23쪽, 전체 19쪽
• 주제분류: 예술체육 > 예술일반
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.12.31

영문 초록

How violent actions could affect us hedonically? The Eyes of the audienceare consistently fixed to the scenes of The Film 1) which isrepulsive but beautiful, or beautiful but repulsive and then they seriouslyquestion themselves about raison(reason) and deraison. The opening of thefilm , The Thief, Albert(Michael Gambon) harass a poor sacrifice,boy forcing to eat crap and having a piss very cruelly and viciously. Froma commonsesne standpoint, As soon as Some audience saw the disgustingscene, they ran out a theater expressing disgust. but such a situation neverhappened. Maybe the director, Peter Greenaway reckons on not giving riseto that happening. Moreover, Some audience can afford to get an obviousthrill out of abhorrence of reproduced screen image. It is the same meaningthat Sade was sure that Inside of us as human has been exactly ‘Sadism’like theory of ‘Freud’. Of course, ‘Freud’ mustbe clear about harsh sexualdesire of human. Either realistically or artificially, The audience having seenthe film experienced almost simultaneously repulsion and enchantment. Eventually, throughout the film The director Peter Greenaway would expect that the audience went through a strong impact effect likethat. I suppose that the film is to be what is a ‘Sadism’ withinvery expanded meaning. The audience are focused on the screen which teemwith extremely voluptuous sexual desire that is sexual behavior, violence,voyerism, power and sin etc. The Film involved the imagewhich was identified with the thought that human being cannot choose butfeel an extreme pleasure simultaneously with an extreme unpleasure. butThe film has to confront the audience with a sexual perversionand the audience is obliged to recognize a impersonality concealing innerside of human being. Simultaneously the audience is obliged to appreciatea relation of a hedonic death and a voluptuous pleasure life. In an extensionof a hedonic death and a voluptuous pleasure life, we should reflect seriouslyhow to experience pleasure into unpleasure or unpleasure into pleasure. Finallythe film implies that a moral sense of human being could befound all the better by a process of observing a staggering immoral actionand how to be easily broken. From now, I give a description of this problemFocusing on Freud’s perspective.

목차

1. 들어가며

2. 아리스토텔레스

2. 프로이트

3. 르네 지라르

4. 나오며

키워드

Revusion violent Raison & Deraision Sadism Hedonism Pleasure Unpleasure Impersonality Voyerism Extension Morality