학술논문
Co-existence of eco-feminism and patriarchism in W.B. Yeats’s and Seamus Heaney’s poems
이용수 0
- 영문명
- 발행기관
- 한국예이츠학회
- 저자명
- 홍성숙(Sung Sook Hong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『한국 예이츠 저널』26권, 245~260쪽, 전체 16쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 언어학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.12.30
4,720원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
'Eco-feminism' as a combination of two words, 'ecology' and 'feminism', rests on the basic principle that patriarchical philosophies are harmful to women, children, and other living things. Eco-feminists feel that the patriarchical philosophy emphasizes the need to dominate and control unruly females and the unruly wilderness. What is stressed in eco-feminism is to change the still prevailing idea that the male-dominated civilization must be justified: eco-feminists think that human beings came to recognize that such civilization can't be the source of happiness. Meanwhile we can find that in Yeats's and Heaney's poems land and landscape are personified as an oppressed woman, from which I drew a hypothesis that these two poets may offer the prominent examples of literature based upon eco-feminism. By contrast, we can also find that these two poets also reveal patriarchism based upon Catholicism. Therefore, if anything, we can suppose that many works of these poets are reflecting both eco-feminism and patriarchism. The Irish poems and poets cannot but reflect these two ideas: eco-feminism and patriarchism. Meanwhile, in Irish poetry, woman is mainly reflected as three types of human-sovereign, procreator and lover. In Yeats's and Heaney's poems, woman and nature are to be appraised as important materials. Women in Yeats's poems are faithful to the traditional image as the lover or rarely the sovereign. And also, we can find that the persona wants to use her as his poetic inspiration by admiring her beauty and seeking sexual energy and wisdom from her. By contrast, women in Heaney's poems are mainly described as procreators who are to survive the oppressed land. The two poets are to be appraised to reflect eco-feminism in that they both show their love for woman and nature. Strictly speaking, however, Heaney's poems are more declined to eco-feminism while Yeats's poems are more declined to patriarchism: in Heaney's poems land and landscape sometimes appear as the oppressed woman; in Yeats's poems the persona blames woman for her violence, emphasizing that woman should have courtesy, wisdom and sexual attraction, not the intellectual hatred, whereas in Heaney's poems the persona never blames woman but feels pity for her oppressed situation.
영문 초록
목차
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 예이츠의 「젊었을 때와 늙었을 때의 한 여성」에서의 여성의 성
- 거시사와 가족사의 간격: 존 몬타그의 시세계
- 『한국예이츠저널』 수록논문의 국내문헌 인용 고찰
- Deconstruction and Decreation: Yeats, Stevens, and Picasso as Poet and Artist
- W. B. Yeats’s View of Good and Evil
- 소용돌이(“The Gyres”): 새로운 출발
- 『역사 밖에서』(Outside History)와 이반 볼랜드(Eavan Boland)의 몸의 시학
- Co-existence of eco-feminism and patriarchism in W.B. Yeats’s and Seamus Heaney’s poems
- 글쓰기 주체와 인식적 지도 그리기
- 늙음, 욕망, 그리고 상상력 - “탑”의 세 작품을 중심으로
- 예이츠와 보르헤스의 상호 텍스트성: 그 연접과 이접
- [Book Review] James Pethica, Yeats’s Poetry, Drama, and Prose. A Norton Critical Edition
- The Reinscription of Home, Gender and Nationalism in Anne Devlin’s Ourselves Alone
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
