한국어 숙달도 평가 도구로서 유럽공통참조기준 자가진단표의 타당도 검증 및 활용 방안

• 영문명: Validation of CEFR Can-Do Statements as a Self-assessment Instrument of Korean Proficiency
• 발행기관: 이중언어학회
• 저자명: 최재수
• 간행물 정보: 『이중언어학』제82호, 161~192쪽, 전체 32쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 언어학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2021.03.31

영문 초록

This study demonstrates empirical evidence of the self-assessment battery designed to distinguish between intermediate and advanced learners of Korean with a focus on structural, content, and construct aspect of validity. All 24 statements were selected from the CEFR self-assessment grid and converted into 6-point Likert scale items and administered to 217 university-level Chinese students (Council of Europe, 2001). The item responses were analyzed by the AMOS version 20.0 and the R package version 3.4.3, using a structural equation modeling (SEM) and a generalized partial credit model (GPCM). The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the selected 24 statements constructed four factors (i.e., RC, LC, SP, and WR) and grouped into two meta-criteria (i.e., understanding vs. production skills) which are structurally aligned with the CEFR skill description. The Logit scale of item difficulty indexes showed that the items are sensitive and systematically distributed in relation to the expected difficulty range. The discrimination indexes revealed that only one item showed a low discrimination index below threshold, suggesting that the quality of items is generally acceptable.

목차

1. 서론

2. 이론적 배경

3. 연구문제 및 연구방법

4. 결과 해석 및 연구모형 검증

5. 자가평가 도구의 수정･보완 및 활용 방안

6. 결론 및 제언

참고문헌

키워드

자가평가 타당도 검사 요인분석 문항반응이론 self-assessment validation factor analysis item response theory