新时代“枫桥经验”视域下民事案件诉前调解功能异化风险分析

• 영문명: Analysis of the Risk of Functional Alienation in Pre-litigation Mediation of Civil Cases from the Perspective of the “Fengqiao Experience” in the New Era
• 발행기관: YIXIN 출판사
• 저자명: Dezheng Wang Zhangli Xu
• 간행물 정보: 『Journal of east Asian law studies』Vol.2 No.3, 13~27쪽, 전체 15쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2025.09.30

국문 초록

As an oriental model of social governance, the “Feangqiao Experience” in the new era contributes Chinese wisdom to the effective governance of grassroots disputes. The implementation of this experience through pre-litigation mediation not only serves as an important governance approach in a civilized society but also represents a vivid practice of Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law in the field of social governance. An empirical study into the pre-litigation mediation practices of L City reveals that its innovative “321 Mediation Model” has garnered attention and commendation from central authorities. However, in practice, this model is also exposed to risks of functional alienation. Issues such as the forced participation in mediation procedures, procedural irregularities, and poor mediation outcomes unsatisfactory mediation outcomes cannot be overlooked. The lack of supporting mechanisms, heavy caseloads for judicial personnel, and performance assessment pressures have collectively undermined the intended function of pre-litigation mediation. Addressing and correcting the risk of functional alienation requires a dual approach involving conceptual rectification and institutional optimization. It is necessary to establish a sound supporting framework for pre-litigation mediation, standardize its scope, procedures, and legal effects, ensuring that parties are willing to mediate and mediators are capable of facilitating mediation. Moreover, the operational processes must be standardized to prevent the mediation mechanism from degenerating into a utilitarian tool for offloading court caseloads.

영문 초록

新时代“枫桥经验”作为社会治理的东方经验，为基层纠纷的有效治理贡献了中国智慧。以诉前调解为路径的新时代枫桥经验实践，既是文明社会纠纷解决的重要治理方式之一，也是习近平法治思想在社会治理领域的生动实践。通过对L 市诉前调解的实践进行考察发现，该市所创制的321 调解模式获得了国家高层的关注和表彰，然而，该模式在具体的实践中却也存在功能异化风险。诉前调解程序参与强制性、程序失范以及调解效果欠佳等问题不容忽视。具体的配套机制缺位，司法人员案件负荷以及绩效考核等反噬了其应有的功能。诉前调解功能异化风险的防范与矫正，需从理念纠偏与制度优化二重面向着手。既要建立健全诉前调解的配套机制，规范诉前调解的范围、程序和效力，使得当事人愿调解、调解人员能调解；更要规范具体的诉前调解操作流程，防止其异化为转移法院案件负荷的功利性工具。

목차

Ⅰ. 引言

Ⅱ. 研究设计与数据收集

Ⅲ. 范畴提炼与模型建构

Ⅳ. 诉前调解功能异化风险的内涵厘定与表征阐述

Ⅴ. 成因思量：321 诉前调解功能异化风险成因厘定

Ⅵ. 路径探索:321 调解模式功能异化风险的制度矫正

Ⅶ. 结语

参考文献

키워드

Fengqiao Experience Pre-litigation Mediation 321 Mediation Protocol Functional Alienation Risk Grounded Theory 枫桥经验 诉前调解 321 调解模式 功能异化风险 扎根理论