아랍어 동사 지배력 변화에 관한 연구

• 영문명: A Study on the Change in Arabic Verb Dominance
• 발행기관: 한국아랍어아랍문학회
• 저자명: 이인섭(Inseop Lee)
• 간행물 정보: 『아랍어와 아랍문학』29집 2호, 1~25쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 언어학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2025.08.30

국문 초록

This research revisits the article “A Study on the Valency of Arabic Verbs” published in the Korean Journal of Middle East Studies (1999), with the aim of correcting its errors, addressing its shortcomings, and supplementing its arguments. In particular, it investigates the shifts in dominance that determine verb valency. The study argues that distributionalism alone has limitations in explaining the changes in verb forms and syntactic structures within a sentence. Therefore, a proper analysis of Arabic sentences requires a clear understanding of both the structural and semantic properties of verbs. This research examines how verb valency varies according to the dominance relations among sentence constituents. Even when a verb maintains the same form, its dominance may differ depending on whether a preposition is added or omitted. Such variation is attributable to the lexical capacity of verbs to allow al-taḍmīn (“inclusion of another meaning”) or to accept changes in word order. When a transitive verb is used with a meaning other than its original one, a preposition may be added according to its sense, which can result in its surface appearance as intransitive. Similarly, when a change in word order weakens the dominance of the verb, a transitive verb may function as though it were intransitive. Conversely, an intransitive verb can also take on transitive usage, either because of its polysemous semantic features or due to al-taḍmīn. It should be noted that al-taḍmīn applies in both directions: when a transitive verb functions intransitively and when an intransitive verb functions transitively. To explain the latter, this research adopts the concept of an “accusative with omitted preposition.” Intransitive-to-transitive usage appears, for example, when a possessive suffix pronoun following a preposition functions as a direct object, or when verbs such as “enter”, “live”, and “pass by” precede non-derived place nouns. It can also arise when the preposition before the complementizers أَنَّ and أَنْ is omitted. However, when such omission would lead to ambiguity, the preposition is retained. The phenomenon of the “accusative with omitted preposition” likewise occurs when verbs have polysemous meanings.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 아랍어에서 지배력 해석 방법

Ⅲ. 동사의 지배력 변화

Ⅳ. 타동사의 자동사화

Ⅴ. 자동사의 타동사화

Ⅵ. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

아랍어 동사 결합가 지배력 타동사의 자동사화 자동사의 타동사화 다른 의미 포함하기 Arabic Verb Valency Dominance Transitive verbs used intransitively Intransitive verbs used transitively Inclusion of another meaning (al-taḍmīn)