全球气候治理与单边气候规制的博弈及中国战略——由欧盟碳边境调节机制引发的思考

• 영문명: Game between Global Climate Governance and Unilateral Climate Regulation and China’s Strategy: Thoughts Triggered by the EU CBAM
• 발행기관: YIXIN 출판사
• 저자명: Jin Mingzi Wang Yanqiu
• 간행물 정보: 『Journal of east Asian law studies』Vol.2 No.1, 1~14쪽, 전체 14쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2025.03.31

국문 초록

The continuous change of global climate has an important impact on the ecosystem and environment of all countries. If we don't pay attention to it, it will become a common threat to all countries in the world. The principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities”, as an important principle that all countries should bear to protect the global environment, occupies a place in the field of international climate governance, but its provisions and specific compliance are still in an unsatisfactory state. Some countries and regions put this principle on hold, and these countries are more willing to adopt domestic unilateral climate regulation than solving global climate change problems through mutual assistance, cooperation and consultation among countries. As a typical example of unilateral climate regulation in recent years, the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism(CBAM) is essentially a new type of green trade barrier, although the EU advocates that the mechanism does not violate any rules and principles, but it “forcibly” extends the EU climate rules to the whole world and wants to trigger the Brussels effect. Today, with the continuous development of globalization, global climate governance should not be a stepping stone to the political or economic game of various countries. The developed countries' disregard for the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities” has a strong hegemonic attribute, and developing countries should take various measures to prevent various unilateral climate regulation behaviors and avoid falling into the “game of rise and containment”. From the perspective of EU CBAM, this paper discusses the conflict and coordination between global climate governance and unilateral climate regulation, and tries to put forward a feasible scheme for China to lead global climate governance.

영문 초록

全球气候持续变化对各国生态系统和环境有着重要影响，如不重视，将会演变成世界各国的共同威胁。“共同但有区别的责任”原则作为各国对保护全球环境应承担的一项重要原则，在国际气候治理领域占据一席之地，但该原则的规定与具体遵守仍处于不理想的状态。有些国家和地区将该原则架空，相比通过国家间的互助与合作协商解决全球气候变化问题，这些国家更乐于采取国内单边气候规制行为。欧盟碳边境调节机制作为近年来单边气候规制的典型，尽管欧盟主张该机制不违反任何规则原则，但其“强行”将欧盟气候规则扩展至全世界，欲引发布鲁塞尔效应的举措，本质上为新型的绿色贸易壁垒。在全球化不断发展的今天，全球气候治理不应当成为各国政治或经济博弈的垫脚石，发达国家漠视“共同但有区别的责任”原则这一行为具有强烈的霸权属性，发展中国家应采取多种措施防范各种单边气候规制行为，避免陷入“崛起与遏制的博弈”。本文从欧盟碳边境调节机制的视角出发，探讨全球气候治理与单边气候规制的冲突与协调，力图提出中国引领全球气候治理的可行性方案。

목차

Ⅰ. 引言

Ⅱ. 主要国家的气候变化应对行动

Ⅲ. 欧盟碳边境调节机制（CBAM）的制度架构

Ⅳ. 全球气候治理与单边气候规制的冲突

Ⅴ. 中国协调全球气候治理与单边气候规制的战略

Ⅵ. 结语

키워드

Global climate governance Unilateral climate regulation Common but differentiated responsibilities EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism(CBAM) 全球气候治理 单边气候规制 共同但有区别的责任 欧盟碳边境调节机制