启蒙的辩证反思：现代启蒙“神话”的后果及其对中国的借鉴意义

• 영문명: Dialectical Reflection on Enlightenment: The Consequences of the Modern “Myth” of Enlightenment and Its Implications for China
• 발행기관: YIXIN 출판사
• 저자명: Sun Zhaoyu
• 간행물 정보: 『Journal of Chinese Marxism studies』Vol.1 No.4, 19~24쪽, 전체 6쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2024.12.31

국문 초록

The intricate relationships among Enlightenment Rationality, mythology, technological rationality, and humanistic spirit have exerted profound impacts on modern society. According to Horkheimer and Adorno, Enlightenment Rationality, though rooted in mythology, does not constitute a simple regression but rather achieves a higher level of integration with it. Technological rationality has propelled the development of cultural industries, yet it has simultaneously led to cultural homogenization and the loss of spiritual values. It is imperative to be vigilant against the adverse effects of technological rationality, preserving cultural diversity and spiritual independence. As a developing country, China, while leveraging technological rationality to drive economic and social progress, should also draw from the essence of both Chinese and Western cultures, fostering social transformation and cultural reconstruction to achieve harmonious coexistence between humans and nature. Through technological innovation and institutional construction, a green, healthy, and sustainable harmonious society will be built, ultimately realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.

영문 초록

启蒙理性、神话、技术理性与人文精神之间存在着错综复杂的关系，对现代社会产生了巨大影响。霍克海默和阿多诺认为，启蒙理性虽源于神话，但并非简单回归，而是与之实现更高层次的融合。技术理性推动了文化工业的发展，但同时也导致了文化的同质化和精神价值的丧失。我们应警惕技术理性带来的负面影响，保持文化的多样性和精神独立性。中国作为发展中国家，在利用技术理性推动经济社会发展的同时，更应汲取中西文化精髓，推动社会转型与文化重建，实现人与自然和谐共生。通过技术创新与制度建设，构建绿色、健康、可持续的和谐社会，实现中华民族的伟大复兴。

목차

Ⅰ. 引言

Ⅱ. 启蒙的辩证法：神话与启蒙的交织与反思

Ⅲ. 现代启蒙“神话”的现代后果

Ⅳ. 基于《启蒙辩证法》的启蒙思想研究对社会现状的反思

Ⅴ. 启蒙思想研究对中国社会发展的借鉴意义

키워드

Enlightenment Dialectics Instrumental Rationality Frankfurt School 启蒙辩证法 工具理性 法兰克福学派

참고문헌

• 内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学 版)
• 上海人民出版社
• 社会科学战线
• 社会科学家
• 求是学刊
• 求是学刊