- 영문명
- The ownership restrictions in the Chinese Property Law
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 이상욱(Lee, Sang-wook)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第25卷 第3號, 455~478쪽, 전체 24쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2009.02.28
5,680원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
The Chinese property law was established on March. 16th. 2007, and it was entered into force since October 1st. 2007. When those property laws were codified, the creation of ownership system parts came into a huge issue as a legal problem. Above all, based on the Chinese government system, which claims to stand for socialist market economy and aim at co-ownership system, the ownership on the Chinese property law is one of most cardinal system in china nowadays.
The article 4 of the Chinese property law provides that one's property must be protected by legal principle. It shall not be infringed no matter what; nevertheless, when people compare between Korean legal principles and Chinese legal principle, several questions have been arisen, and how much personal ownership can be restricted in the socialist country, like China.
As the matter of fact, the legal principles, that restricted the ownership on the Chinese property law, are simply divided into 5 categories.
1. The first principle could be the prohibition of ownership restriction itself. Certain properties, which are owned by country or group, shall not be owned by one person. For instance, there are wide ranges of the ownership areas, such as real estates, wild animals, natural resources, and radio waves.
2. Relationship between adjacent land owners could be the second principle. These restrictions are divided into four types, such as claim of use adjacent land, using Water right, the relationship with ventilation, lighting and sunshine, and damage on the real estate prevention. However, there is numerous institutional inertia contents' in those restriction areas.
3. The restrictions by the expropriation and requisition are also the principle. Even though, it belongs to an administrative decree, China regulated those principles in the Chinese property law, duet their political system.
4. There are restrictions on the expenditure as one principle that as an impact of existence of agricultural land protection political policy in China. China restricted the agriculturally and as the country's exclusive constructive land.
5. Eventually, there are restrictions that are made by public interest as another principle. When the ownership are exercised, it shall not be originated that damage on the public interest.
As a result of socialist market economy system, co-economy system has adopted, the conclusion should point out that the country, like Korea, which have the liberal market economy's ownership, assumes different aspects. The Chinese property law, which could not be exclude country's political situation, regulates the peculiar systems, when she compare with our real estates system even the principle of the ownership areas restriction.
목차
Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 소유권의 내용
Ⅲ. 소유권 제한의 유형과 내용
Ⅳ. 결
참고 문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 채권자대위권에 있어서 금전채권을 보전할 필요성
- 중국 물권법상의 소유권 제한
- 예외법 확대적용 금지의 원칙
- 민법개정과 착오법리
- 附錄 외
- 베트남 기업입법의 배경과 개정기업법의 구조
- 학교안전사고와 손해배상책임
- 점유자의 과실취득권과 부당이득
- 법학교육에 대한 새로운 방법론
- 중국 농촌집체토지수급경영권의 징수와 보상제도
- 이사회의 보수결정에 대한 미국법원의 사법심사와 이사의 성실의무
- 제575조의 하자담보책임에 대한 비판적 논의
- 격지자 간의 계약성립시기에 관한 검토
- 불공정약관 조항의 유형과 특징
- 할부거래법 개정안에 대한 고찰
- 소멸시효와 제척기간
- 민법상 주소의 표기방법에 관한 연구
- 위탁저작물의 업무상저작물성
- 宗敎團體의 紛爭과 財産歸屬에 관한 硏究
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 법학분야 BEST
- 인공지능 판사, 과연 가능한가?
- 정치의 사법화와 사법의 정치화 : 온건하고 실용적인 헌법재판의 당위성
- 자국 우선주의 정책과 국제법상 난민⋅이민자 보호-트럼프 행정부의 미국 우선주의를 중심으로-
법학 > 법학분야 NEW
더보기최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
