论《澳门特别行政区基本法》对私有财产权的保护

• 영문명: The Protection of Private Property Rights in the Basic Law of the Macau Special Administrative Region
• 발행기관: YIXIN 출판사
• 저자명: 胡春燕(Hu Chunyan)
• 간행물 정보: 『Journal of east Asian law studies』제1권 제2호, 97~105쪽, 전체 9쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2024.09.30

국문 초록

The right of private property is an important foundation of the capital-dominated economic system of the Macao SAR, and Articles 6 and 103 of the Basic Law of Macao stipulate the protection of the private property rights of private individuals and legal persons. In terms of structure and content, Article 103 is a concrete expansion of Article 6, specifying in detail the subjects of private property rights and the specific types of rights. Then, through the analysis of the four specific rights, it can be seen that the object of private property rights is not confined to tangible or intangible things. Although the Basic Law does not explicitly stipulate the restriction on private property rights, through systematic interpretation and exploration of the principles of the social state in modern capitalist countries, it can be seen that private property rights can still be limited by legal retention and social obligations. Expropriation and social obligations, both of which are government interventions in private property rights, should be limited and then revert to the protection of private property rights.

영문 초록

私有财产权是澳门特区资本主义经济制度的重要基础，澳门基本法在第6 条和第103 条规定了对私人和法人私有财产权的保护。在结构和内容上，第103 条是对第6 条的具体展开，详细规定了私有财产权的主体、和具体权利类型。继而，通过对四种具体权利的分析可知私有财产权的客体并不拘泥于有形物或无形物。有保护就会有限制，基本法虽然未明文规定对私有财产权的限制，但通过体系解释和对现代资本主义国家社会国原则的探究可知私有财产权仍可通过法律保留受限以及本身负有社会义务。征用和社会义务都是政府对私有财产权的干预，都应得到限制，进而回复到对私有财产权的保护上。

목차

Ⅰ. 引言

Ⅱ.《基本法》私有财产权保护条款的结构与逻辑

Ⅲ.《基本法》私有财产权条款的保护范围

Ⅳ.《基本法》私有财产权保护条款的隐含限制

Ⅴ. 政府干预私有财产权的限制

Ⅵ. 结语

키워드

Macao Basic Law private property rights constitutional protection Limitation of Rights 澳门基本法 私有财产权 宪法保护 权利限制