연극영화과목 중등교사 임용시험 1차(선택형) 평가 개선 방안 연구

• 영문명: A Study on the Evaluation Instrument of the 1st Test (multiple choice question type) of Employment for Secondary School Teacher in Theater & Film Section
• 발행기관: 한국영화학회
• 저자명: 박철 오세곤
• 간행물 정보: 『영화연구』제38호, 179~200쪽, 전체 22쪽
• 주제분류: 예술체육 > 예술일반
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.12.31

영문 초록

The 1st test for secondary teacher in Theater and Film section is a multiple choice question type. The 1st test has an object to select a person which has an ability and a qualification as a teacher in theater and film section. For this purpose, it has to be prepared the evaluation instrument for the comprehension of the subject in theater and film. And also it has to be presented methodology for education. That is for teacher professional development and the development of more effective curriculum to produce secondary teacher in theater and film. This paper researches on the development of instrument of the 1st test which is given questions by multiple choice type. In this paper, it is included the purpose, a principle of the development of the evaluation instrument, and also prepared a plan for a fair evaluation. For a fair evaluation, this study present the questions of a good quality examined by the degree of difficulty, universal validity, reliability, distinction and practicalness. The 1st evaluation instrument is based on the 'development of teacher qualification standard of major subject, detailed evaluation field and joint study of teaching ability evaluation'. Committee members for the test select a evaluation details factor in 45 evaluation areas, and develop the questions.

목차

1. 중등교사 임용시험 1차(선택형) 평가 도구의 목적 및 방향

2. 1차(선택형) 평가 도구 개발의 원칙

3. 평가 영역 및 평가 내용 요소가 출제에 고르게 반영될 수 있는 방안

4. 평가의 공정성 확보를 위한 방안 제시

5. 적절한 이원분류표 제시

6. 문항 카드 형식 및 내용

7. 여러 평가 유형의 문항 제시

8. 연구 개발 산출물을 출제에 활용할 수 있는 방법 제시

키워드

the 1st test for secondary teacher in Theater and Film section a multiple choice question the development of evaluation instrument a fair evaluation degree of difficulty universal validity reliability distinction and practicalness