한국어 쓰기 능력 평가 방안

• 영문명: A Study on the Assessment of Writing Proficiency in Korean: Focus on the Result of Comprehensive and Analytic Scoring
• 발행기관: 이중언어학회
• 저자명: 김정숙
• 간행물 정보: 『이중언어학』제43호, 81~99쪽, 전체 19쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 언어학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.06.30

영문 초록

The purpose of this study is to find the mean score for Korean learners’ writing proficiency, objectively and reliably, by comparing the result of holistic and analytic scoring. To this ends, 10 experienced teachers are asked to score 10 Korean learners' writings using holistic and analytic analysis. In the next stage, each score is compared and analyzed. The following are the results: First in order to result in objective and reliable assessment, analytic scoring is more suitable than holistic scoring which are affected by emotional factors and raters’ preconceived notions. Secondly, analytic scoring can assess low-rated writings in a more objective and reliable way. Lastly analytic scoring is able to shed light on the shortcomings of writers’ proficiency. In other words, analytic scoring could assess sub-skills which have a different developmental stage and would confirm there is a washback effect in writing education.

목차

1. 서론

2. 실험 내용 및 방법

3. 실험 결과 분석

4. 결론

참고 문헌

키워드

쓰기 능력 평가 종합적 채점 분석적 채점 평가 범주 신뢰도 환류 효과 writing assessment holistic scoring analytic scoring rubric reliability washback effect