일본 및 유럽철도에 있어서의 구조개혁과 공공예산지원

• 영문명: The Japan-Europe Comparative Study about Railroad Structural Reform and Public Budget Subsidy
• 발행기관: 한일경상학회
• 저자명: 임채성(Chai Sung Lim)
• 간행물 정보: 『한일경상논집』제40권, 103~128쪽, 전체 26쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 경영학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.06.30

영문 초록

This paper compared Japanese railroad structural reform with European railroad reform and made it clear how management improvement was performed. The Japanese reform was based on regional division and privatization. In addition to that, the separation of infrastructure and operation was accomplished. Because new JR 7 companies` management stability was emphasized by Japanese Government, Only long term debt of JNR that JR would be capable of paying back was taken by JR. To secure the new profit-making sources, JR developed diversification of business lines aggressively. As a result, JR achieved surplus management without receiving the subsidy from the government. On the other hand, business-economy and socio-economy were divided by the separation of infrastructure and operation in Europe. Market competition was requested about business-economy, but public budget support should be performed to socio-economy. Therefore, European railroads restrained diversification of business lines and concentrated management resources in railroad operation. Though railroading was improved, the management deficit continued, and a government burden increased. Considering railroad reforms of advanced countries, Korean Railroad Corporation should create the new profit-making sources and make it up the fare revenue that is estimated to decrease for aging.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 철도구조개혁의 배경과 그 추진

Ⅲ. 개혁후 철도경영과 정부재정 부담

Ⅳ. 결론- 한국철도개혁에 대한 시사점

참고문헌

키워드

railroad structural reform management diversification regional division and privation separation of infrastructure and operation