지식산업센터 관련 제도 평가 및 개선방안 연구

• 영문명: A Study to Improve Regulation by a Evaluation of System in Knowledge Industrial Center
• 발행기관: 한국부동산학회
• 저자명: 왕정한(Wang, Jeong Han) 송호창(Song, Ho Chang)
• 간행물 정보: 『부동산학보』不動産學報 第50輯, 236~248쪽, 전체 13쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 경제학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.09.30

영문 초록

1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES This study examines political implications for improving regulations in Korea through conducting surveys targeting Knowledge Industrial Centers across the nation and analyzing their level of importance and satisfaction in regulations. (2) RESEARCH METHOD A groundwork for this study was on the basis of a review of precedent studies and analysis of knowledge industrial centers such as investigation of their present state as well as of locational and physical characteristics. Also, analyzed differences of satisfaction degree of residents, suppliers, and managers using IPA(Importance-Performance Analysis). (3) RESEARCH FINDINGS The result of analysis using IPA, managers had the highest satisfaction and attached the most importance to regulations, followed by suppliers and residents. In the survey of satisfaction in regulations, five regulations and its factors, such as the limit of kinds of supporting facilities, no resident's rent, no resident's monopoly, business supporting facilities, and supporting public facilities, shows differences of estimation. 2. RESULTS The result shows that, in the matter of the factor of the limit of kinds of supporting facilities, residents considered it as a high priority of improving, while suppliers thought it to be loosened controls or abolished. But, managers wanted it to be maintained or expanded. Next, as the factor of no resident's rent, residents thought it to be loosened controls or abolished, while suppliers evaluated it to be maintained or managed. managers, meanwhile, wanted it to be maintained or expanded. As the factor of no resident's monopoly, residents and suppliers wanted it to be loosened controls or abolished, while managers considered it to be maintained or expanded. As the factor of business supporting facilities, residents evaluated it as a high priority of improving, while suppliers thought it to be maintained or expanded. As the factor of supporting public facilities, residents and suppliers estimated it as which needed to be loosened control or abolished, while managers considered it as a high priority of improving.

목차

ABSTRACT

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰

Ⅲ. 평가지표의 설정 및 분석개요

Ⅳ. 이해주체별 지식산업센터 제도 평가

Ⅴ. 결 론

參考文獻

키워드

지식산업센터 중요도 만족도 제도개선 중요도-만족도분석 knowledge industrial center Importance Satisfaction Improvement in Regulation Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA)