일제 강제징용 손해배상 소송에 대한 피해자 중심주의 적용 담론

• 영문명: Discourse over Applying the Victim-Centeredness to the Suit for Damages to the Compulsory Manpower Draft by the Japanese Military Regime
• 발행기관: 조선대학교 민주평화연구원
• 저자명: 강경숙(Kyungsook Kang)
• 간행물 정보: 『민주평화연구』제2권 제2호, 54~84쪽, 전체 31쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.12.31

국문 초록

The Korean Supreme Court judged that Shinilcheoljugeum( or Nippon Steel), a Japanese steel company succeeding to the old Japan Steel that is believed to have treated the Korean laborers harshly, should provide alimony to them in the damage suit. The decision was the first that the complainants had won a case after losing in Japan and the United States. The years of 2013 and 2018, when they won the suit in the Supreme Court, witnessed more academic discussion over the event, mainly in the field of law. However, this paper, besides the legal argument, suggests the victim-centeredness to solve this problem causing the current Korean-Japanese trade strife. The second chapter studies the ideas brought about so far based on the events relating to the suit for damages to the compulsory manpower draft during the Japanese regime. The third applies the victim-centeredness as an established international principle in the UN to this case and insists on the validity and feasibility from the diplomatic and political angle. Lastly, I conclude that the retributive and reparative power of applying the victim-centered idea to this case is the most feasible and extensional measure to the sensitive matter of the Korean-Japanese diplomatic relations.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 일제 강제징용 손해배상소송 담론

Ⅲ. 법적 논쟁 이외에 피해자 중심주의 논리 활용

Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

신일철주금 일제강점기 강제징용 피해자 중심주의 응보적이고 보상적인 힘 한·일 외교관계 Shinilcheoljugeum compulsory manpower draft during the Japanese regime victim-centeredness retributive and reparative power Korean-Japanese diplomatic relations