본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

영광 3&4와 5&6호기에서 액체 방사성폐기물 처리방법의 비교

이용수  0

영문명
The Comparison on Treatment Method of Liquid Radioactive Waste in Yonggwang #3&4 and #5&6
발행기관
한국방사성폐기물학회
저자명
염유선 김승평 이승진
간행물 정보
『Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology (JNFCWT)』Vol.2 No.3, 219~230쪽, 전체 12쪽
주제분류
공학 > 공학일반
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2004.09.30
4,240

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

Most of the low-level liquid radioactive wastes generated from PWR plants are classified into high or low total suspended solid(HTDS or LTDS), and into radiochemical and radioactive laundry waste. Although the evaporation process has a high decontami- nation ability, it has several problems such as corrosion, foam, and congestion. A new liquid waste disposal process using the ion-exchange demineralizer(IED), instead of the current evaporation process, has been introduced into the Yonggwang NPP #5 and 6 . These two methods have been compared to understand the differences in this study. Aspects compared here were the released radioactivity amount of the liquid radioactive wastes, the dose of off-site residents, the decontamination factor, and the amount of the solid radioactive wastes. The IED system is designed to discharge higher radioactivity about 20% than the evaporating system, and the actual radioactivity released from the evaporating and IED system were 0.473mCi and 1.098mCi, respectively. The radioactivity released from the IED was 2.32 times higher than that of the evaporating system. The dose of off-site residents was 2.97×m㏜ for the evaporating system, and 6.47×m㏜ for IED. The decontamination factor(DF) of the evaporator is, in most cases, far lower than the lower limits of detection(LLD) with the Ge-Li detector. Due to the low concentration of the liquid wastes collected from the liquid waste system, the decontamination factor of IED is very low. Since there is not enough data on the amount of solid radioactive wastes generated by the evaporation system, the comparison on these two systems has been conducted on the basis of the design, and the comparison result was that the evaporating system generated more wastes about 40% than IED.

영문 초록

목차

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

염유선 ,김승평,이승진. (2004).영광 3&4와 5&6호기에서 액체 방사성폐기물 처리방법의 비교. Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology (JNFCWT), 2 (3), 219-230

MLA

염유선 ,김승평,이승진. "영광 3&4와 5&6호기에서 액체 방사성폐기물 처리방법의 비교." Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology (JNFCWT), 2.3(2004): 219-230

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제