국제적 소송경합에 관한 입법적 제안

• 발행기관: 한국민사소송법학회
• 저자명: 이헌묵
• 간행물 정보: 『민사소송』제23권 제3호, 385~428쪽, 전체 44쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.10.30

영문 초록

This article discussed legislative proposal in terms of parallel proceedings in international litigation. The summary of the proposal is as follows: first, the Korean court second seised shall suspend of its own motion or on the application of one of the parties its proceedings. However, the court shall continue its proceedings provided the claim filed to the Korean court has its own interests to be protected. Secondly whether cause of actions and parties in the both proceedings are same shall be decided by way of comparing the scopes of res judicata under both foreign law and Korean law. thirdly the time when a court shall be deemed to be seised is the time when the documents instituting the proceedings are served on the defendants. fourthly, the court shall continue its proceedings when foreign judgments that may not be recognised in Korea are provided to the court or when the foreign courts either suspend or dismiss its own proceedings. Fifthly the court may continue its proceedings when it appears to the court that the proceedings in the foreign court are unlikely to be concluded within a reasonable time. Sixthly the court shall dismiss the proceedings if the proceedings in the foreign court are concluded and have resulted in a judgment capable of recognition in accordance with Korean law or international treaty.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설

Ⅱ. 국제적 소송경합이 발생하기 위한 요건

Ⅲ. 국제적 소송경합의 처리

Ⅳ. 중지된 절차의 속행 및 소의 각하

Ⅴ. 우선주의의 완화의 필요와 방법

Ⅵ. 결론

키워드

국제민사소송법 국제적 소송경합 중복제소금지의 법리 부적절한 법정지 법리 외국재판의 승인 및 집행 국제재판관할 승인된 외국재판의 기판력 international civil procedure law lis pendens doctrine of lis pendens forum non conveniens recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments preclusion effect of recognized foreign judgments international jurisdiction