이란 형법의 사형제도와 인권 논쟁 연구

• 영문명: A Study on the Controversies Regarding Islamic Penal Code of Iran and Human Rights
• 발행기관: 명지대학교 중동문제연구소
• 저자명: 신양섭(Shin, Yang-Sup)
• 간행물 정보: 『중동문제연구』중동문제연구 제16권3호, 93~135쪽, 전체 43쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 지역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2017.09.30

영문 초록

Iran ranks second for number of executions after China, and first for per capita executions in the world. Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Iran. According to the Islamic Penal Code of Iran revised in 2013, crimes punishable by death include murder, rape, adultery, sodomy, drug trafficking, armed robbery, kidnapping, terrorism, and treason. Due to the increasing number of executions and the persistence of practices that contravene international human rights law relating to the death penalty, international human rights organizations like Amnesty International, International Federation for Human Rights, Human Rights Watch, and Iran Human Rights blame the Iranian government for her unfair judiciary system and unjust penal code. They insist that the Iranian government has to implement gender-neutral age of majority, end to sentencing and execution of juvenile offenders, restrict the scope of the death penalty, and an end to public executions.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 이란의 사법제도와 형법 구조

Ⅲ. 이란 형법의 사형죄

Ⅳ. 이란의 사형제도에 대한 국제인권단체의 논쟁

Ⅴ. 결론

키워드

Iran Shari‘ah Islamic Penal Code Hodud Qesas Diyeh Ta‘zir Human Rights Death Penalty Stoning to Death Public Execution