험프리매트릭스 주파수배가시야검사법과 표준 자동시야검사법의 검사 지표에 대한 비교 분석

• 영문명: Performance of Humphrey Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry Global Indices
• 발행기관: 대한안과학회
• 저자명: 남윤표 강성용 박성배 성경림 국문석,Yoonpyo Nam, MD, Sung Yong Kang, MD, Seong Bae Park, MD,Kyung Rim Sung, MD, PhD, Michael S. Kook, MD
• 간행물 정보: 『대한안과학회지』Ophthalmological Society,volume50,number11, 1680~1685쪽, 전체 6쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 기타의약학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2009.11.15

영문 초록

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry (Matrix) global indices with standard automated perimetry (SAP) for glaucoma discrimination. Methods: Forty-seven healthy and 63 glaucomatous subjects were included in this study. Glaucoma was defined as having glaucomatous optic disc and glaucomatous visual field defect. Correlations of mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) between Matrix and SAP were evaluated. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for discriminating healthy from glaucoma, sensitivity, and cut-off value at fixed specificity of MD and PSD were determined in Matrix and SAP. Results: MD and PSD from Matrix were highly correlated with SAP data in glaucomatous eyes (r =0.80, 0.69 p<0.001, <0.001). The AUCs of MD and PSD from Matrix (0.941, 0.921) were of comparable diagnostic capability to SAP data (0.876, 0.923, p=0.068, 0.927). The sensitivity at 90% specificity of MD was 67.9% in SAP, 76.4% in Matrix, with the cut off value of MD at 90% specificity at -3.10dB in SAP and -3.72dB in Matrix. Conclusions: MD and PSD data from Matrix and SAP significantly correlated in glaucomatous eyes and showed similar diagnostic performance for discriminating healthy from glaucoma however, both MD and PSD are scaled differently on SAP and Matrix, which suggests that application of these parameters in a manner similar to that used in SAP should be employed with caution. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2009;50(11):1680-1685

키워드

Glaucoma, Global index, Visual field