일본 특허청에서의 새로운 형태의 상표의 도입방안에 대한 비교법적 고찰

• 영문명: A Comparative Study on Ways Introducing the new types of trademarks in Japan Patent Office
• 발행기관: 세창출판사
• 저자명: 정태호(Tae-Ho Jung)
• 간행물 정보: 『창작과 권리』2010년 봄호 (제58호), 161~200쪽, 전체 39쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.03.01

영문 초록

Several conventions state that "Members may require, as a condition of registration, that signs be visually perceptible". In other words, it does not contain a mandatory requirement for Members to register and protect trademarks consisting of non-visible signs. In some jurisdictions, the issue of graphical representation is dealt with separately, particularly in countries where a condition for registration is that a sign be "represented graphically". The requirement of graphic representation of trademarks has given rise to questions of interpretation in jurisdictions that apply this requirement, in particular with respect to certain non-visible marks, such as sound marks not consisting of musical sounds, or smell marks. In accordance with the jurisprudence of some countries, for example, a graphical representation of a trademark in order to be acceptable must be clear, precise, and complete by itself, easily accessible, understandable, durable and objective. In Japan Patent Office, several subjects on the new types of non-traditional marks are being studied. Korean Intellectual Property Office has already accepted motion marks, hologram marks and color marks in 2007 but has not yet accepted smell marks and sound marks. And Japan Patent Office has not yet accepted the new types of non-traditional marks. On the other hand, we can find out several points overlooked about modifying Trademark Act when analyzing the report of Japan Patent Office. Therefore, we need to review non-traditional marks' systems already accepted by Korean Intellectual Property Office as well as smell marks and sound marks through reference to Japan Patent Office's report. In Conclusion, Korean Intellectual Property Office should consider all contents on the report of Japan Patent Office, in order to minimize several legal problems about the new types of non-traditional marks.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 일본에서의 새로운 형태의 상표도입의 필요성 검토

Ⅲ. 국제적인 동향의 분석

Ⅳ. 구체적인 보호방법에 대한 검토

Ⅴ. 일본 특허청의 구체적인 제도정비방안에 대한 비교법적 검토

Ⅵ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

일본 특허청 새로운 형태 비전형적인 상표 비교법적 고찰 한국 특허청 시각적인 표현 Japan Patent Office New Types non-traditional marks Comparative Study Korean Intellectual Property Office graphical representation