僧朗의 三論學과 師弟說에 대한 誤解와 眞實(Ⅰ)

• 영문명: Misunderstanding and truth about the San lun study of Seng-lang with the relations between master and disciple
• 발행기관: 불교학연구회
• 저자명: 朴商洙(Park Sang-Soo) 김성철, 이현옥
• 간행물 정보: 『불교학연구』창간호, 7~50쪽, 전체 44쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 불교학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2000.12.01

영문 초록

  Generally it is said that the famous buddhist monk Seng-lang(僧郞) came from Koguryeo, who had early learned the theories of Kumarajiva"s system in the Northen China, and thereafter gone down to the Sou서 in the Sung(宋) and ch"i(齊) periods.
  At that place Seng-lang played an important role in the San lun school, and the result described by Chi-tsang(吉藏) was summarized up as these three points.
  1. Seng-lang had teached the hermit Chou-Yong(周？) and Chou-yong later wrote "San-tsung lun"(三宗論).
  2. Seng-lang refuted Ch"eng-shih lun Master(成實論師) and reconstructed New San-lun.
  3. Under the influence of Seng-lang Liang Wu-di(梁武帝) the emperor of Liang dynasty threw away Ch"eng-shih lun and wrote Mahay？na annotation.
  However these days some scholars doubt or deny the traditional records described by Chi-tsang. Such arguments may first came out from 境野黃洋 and the following scholars T"and Yung T"ung(湯用？)ㆍShunei Hirai(平井俊榮) also doubt the records. With one accord they argue that the three points described by Chi-tsang are no more than the exaggerating statement of Chi-tsang.
  But it seems to be rather misunderstanding than truthful. Therefore I put off argument against their opinion to the following chance, in stead regulating their arguments to bring into relief as to what are the main problems is recommended this time.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 승랑의 삼론학 업적과 국내외의 평가
Ⅲ. 僧朗의 學業과 업적을 否定하는 見解들
Ⅳ. 師弟說 等의 變遷과 僧朗의 位相
Ⅴ. 師弟說의 否定에 대한 國內의 反應과 남은 課題
영문초록
「僧朗의 三論學과 師弟說에 대한 誤解와 眞實(Ⅰ)」에 대한 논평
「僧朗의 三論學과 師弟說에 대한 誤解와 眞實(Ⅰ)을」 읽고