항소이유서 강제주의 도입에 관한 소고 - 항소인·항소법원·피항소인의 견지에서

• 발행기관: 한국민사소송법학회
• 저자명: 이찬양
• 간행물 정보: 『민사소송』제29권 제2호, 59~137쪽, 전체 79쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2025.06.30

국문 초록

The mandatory statement of appeal grounds system, which came into effect on March 1, 2025, introduces significant procedural reforms. While the system offers clear advantages, several potential drawbacks and limitations have been raised. In-depth analysis of both the strengths and weaknesses of this new system is essential for its effective implementation and alignment with the overall appeal process. Although previous studies have addressed broader issues related to appellate procedures, specific research focusing on the mandatory submission of appeal grounds remains limited. This article aims to fill that gap by conducting a comprehensive examination of the system from the perspectives of appellants, appellate courts, and appellees. Through this lens, the article identifies the system’s strengths, weaknesses, and limitations, and proposes avenues for improvement. To explore potential reforms, this study engages in a comparative legal analysis involving Germany, the European Model Rules of Civil Procedure, Austria, the United States, and Japan. The core findings and proposals are as follows: From the appellant’s perspective, key concerns include the reasonableness of the 40-day submission deadline, the insufficiency of a one-month extension, potential violations of the right to a fair trial, the need for a more rational classification of appeal grounds, the appropriateness of immediate preclusion upon missing the deadline, and the clarity of the “justifiable reason” clause under Article 126-2(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules. From the appellate court’s perspective, the paper examines whether automatic preclusion without specific criteria is justified when appellants submit new arguments after the deadline. It also scrutinizes the clarity of the court's duty to investigate ex officio under Article 402-3 of the Civil Procedure Act, the rational scope of dismissals under Article 149(1), the appropriateness of using gross negligence as a sanction threshold, the risk of rushed judgments, the compatibility of the mandatory system with the principle of full review, and whether the system has been introduced prematurely. From the appellee’s viewpoint, the paper explores whether requiring a mandatory reply is appropriate, the possibility of setting specific reply deadlines, and whether failure to submit a reply should result in any sanctions. By examining these issues in depth and drawing on comparative jurisprudence, the study seeks to provide constructive recommendations to ensure that the mandatory statement of appeal grounds system contributes meaningfully to a fair and efficient appellate process.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 항소이유서 강제주의 제도 도입의 의의와 그 한계

Ⅲ. 항소이유서 강제주의 제도의 비교법적 고찰

Ⅳ. 항소인·항소법원·피항소인 시각에서 항소이유서 강제주의 도입의 한계에 관한 대안

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

항소이유서 강제주의제도 항소인·항소법원·피항소인 시각에서 항소이유서 강제주의 제도 도입의 한계와 그 대안 항소이유서 제출 기간 및 연장 기간 재판받을 권리 직권조사사유 및 정당한 사유의 명확성 원칙 위반 여부 체계정당성에 따른 항소이유의 합리적 분류 방안 실권효 항소이유서 Mandatory Appellate Brief Filing System The Limitations and Alternatives of Introducing a Mandatory Appellate Brief Filing System: Perspectives from the Appellant the Appellate Court and the Appellee Time Limit and Extension for Submitting an Appellate Brief The Right to a Fair Trial Whether there is a violation of the principle of clarity of the reasons for ex officio investigation and legitimate reasons A Rational Classification of Grounds for Appeal Based on Systemic Legitimacy Effect of loss of rights Statement of Reasons for Appeal

참고문헌

• 성균관법학
• 민사소송
• 인권과 정의
• 법학연구
• 법조
• 민사소송
• 형사재판의 제문제
• 법조
• 사법
• 상고심제도 개선 정책세미나 자료집
• 민사소송
• 인문사회과학연구
• 민사소송
• ZZP
• JZ
• 桐蔭法学
• 東京大学出版会
• 民事手続法研究
• 民事訴訟雜誌