본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

[특집] 한반도 평화체제의 제문제

이용수  3

영문명
The Implication of Worldwide Peace Agreements for Korean Peninsula
발행기관
한국전략문제연구소
저자명
현인택
간행물 정보
『전략연구』통권 제18호, 120~139쪽, 전체 20쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 정치외교학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2000.03.31
5,200

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The Korean Peninsula Peace Regime poses considerable challenges to both Koreas and international community especially in East Asia. As the Cold War ended and new hopes and expectations arise in the Post-Cold War era, we are confronted with the need to adopt a new system of peace regime on the Korean peninsula to bring out stability and peace in this region. Particularly, the current four-party talks among the two Koreas, the United States, and China set up two major agendas for their discussions. One of them is the issue of the Korean Peninsula Peace Regime Building. In this article I investigate what is the most desirable and feasible alternative to peace regime on the Korean peninsula. In doing so, I examine various successful peace negotiations in the world, exploring important implications for the Korean case. I argue that the situation on the Korean peninsula is not perfectly peacefu1. but at the same time not in militarily conflict. It is unstable due largely to the situation of North Korea and its brinkmanship. Thus, it is quite different from the Vietnamese case before its reunification. The role of the United States in the Paris peace negotiations, which eventually led to the reunification by the North Vietnam, was crucial and noteworthy. The United States had negotiated with North Vietnam through clandestine negotiations. I believe that this kind of negotiation behavior is not appropriate and should not be permissible from the South Korean point of view. I argue that in peace negotiation on the Korean peninsula, both South and North Korea only can and should solve the problem. While other actors such as the United States and China can help us, their role should be limited to supplementary or auxiliary one. Both Koreas-already had reached an ideal type of peace agreement, that is, the Basic Agreement in 1991. Simply with the return of this Basic Agreement, we can achieve peace and stability on the Korean peninsula. The peace regime on the Korean peninsula itself is not a panacea for peace and stability in the region, but it could be absolutely a good departure for it.

목차

서문
Ⅰ. 세계 각국의 평화체제 수립의 특징
Ⅱ. 한반도 평화체제 수립의 전제조건
Ⅲ. 한반도 평화체제의 주요 쟁점
결론
Summary

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

현인택. (2000).[특집] 한반도 평화체제의 제문제. 전략연구, (), 120-139

MLA

현인택. "[특집] 한반도 평화체제의 제문제." 전략연구, (2000): 120-139

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제