5ㆍ18 성폭력행위에 대한 궐석재판 이용 가능성 고찰

• 영문명: A Study of the Possibility to Use the Judgment by Default to the 5ㆍ18 Sexual Assault
• 발행기관: 조선대학교 민주평화연구원
• 저자명: 이건근(Lee, Geongeun)
• 간행물 정보: 『민주평화연구』제2권 제1호, 23~42쪽, 전체 20쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.06.30

영문 초록

This paper aims to study the possibility to use the judgment by default to the incidents of 5ㆍ18 sexual assault as an alternative of the truth ascertainment. 5ㆍ18 is still considered as a hot potato that comes to the unreasonable separation of the ideology in Korea between conservative and progressive forces. Unfortunately, the fact-finding of the soldiers atrocious violence against the innocent women of Gwangju is hard to investigate because of statute of limitations. However, by the hint of the examples of people s tribunal in other countries or international cases, the judgment by default might help arouse the national interest in these unjust acts. The 5ㆍ18 sexual assault, a new demonstration of the human rights abuse, should surely be examined and lead to the true democratization, resembling the former comfort women s efforts to speak about their truth.

목차

Ⅰ. 5ㆍ18 진상규명 노력에 성폭력행위 사건 넣기

Ⅱ. 5ㆍ18 성폭력행위 진상규명 조사현황

Ⅲ. 군사적 긴장 상태 성범죄에 대한 국제법 해결 사례

Ⅳ. 궐석재판 이용 가능성 진단

키워드

5ㆍ18 성폭력행위 진상규명 궐석재판 시민재판 공소시효 5ㆍ18 sexual assault truth ascertainment judgment by default people s tribunal statute of limitations