본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

Top Down vs. Grassroots E-Government: A Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of E-Procurement against Corruption in Malaysia and Korea

이용수  39

영문명
발행기관
국제개발협력학회
저자명
James C. Schopf
간행물 정보
『국제개발협력연구』 제11권 제3호, 121~141쪽, 전체 21쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 정책학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2019.09.30
5,320

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Purpose: Democratization and social structure have been identified as critical factors affecting E-Government’s corruption fighting capacity. To determine how E-Government functions differently against corruption in democratic egalitarian vs. authoritarian inegalitarian nations, this study examines the factors behind Korea’s successful anti-corruption E-Procurement program KONEPS and Malaysia’s less successful E-Perolehan program. Originality: Despite the contributions of large sample empirical work, no in-depth case analysis has yet shown how democracy and egalitarian social structure increases E-Government’s effectiveness against corruption, which is important for those interested in reforming under-utilized or ineffectively applied E-Government systems. Methodology: This longitudinal case study unpacks the causal mechanisms between cause and outcome, comparing and contrasting the development of E-Government, in particular, E-Procurement in two East Asian NICS: the consolidated egalitarian democracy of South Korea and single party, inegalitarian Malaysia. Result: Democratization and an egalitarian social structure provided incentives for citizens and politicians to back E-Government as a graft-fighting tool. Korean civic groups pressed to stop corruption and helped design KONEPS to reduce bureaucratic discretion over the selection of tender winners and release of annual purchasing plans and detailed bid information. In contrast, the Malaysian state introduced E-Government to bolster the ruling UMNO’s image and intentionally maintained E-Perolehan’s information asymmetries and bureaucratic discretion to preserve lucrative corruption schemes. Conclusion and Implication: Malaysia’s newly elected opposition party politicians have a strong incentive to use E-Perolehan against corruption by releasing more information regarding procurement plans, contract details and selection criteria while eliminating bureaucratic discretion over the selection of tender winners.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Theory and Methods
Ⅲ. The Korean Case
IV. The Malaysian Case
V. Conclusion

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

James C. Schopf. (2019).Top Down vs. Grassroots E-Government: A Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of E-Procurement against Corruption in Malaysia and Korea. 국제개발협력연구, 11 (3), 121-141

MLA

James C. Schopf. "Top Down vs. Grassroots E-Government: A Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of E-Procurement against Corruption in Malaysia and Korea." 국제개발협력연구, 11.3(2019): 121-141

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제