학술논문
미국 독성물질통제법(TSCA)의 진화
이용수 31
- 영문명
- The Evolution of Toxic Substances Control Act in U.S.
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 윤권순(Yoon Kwon soon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『과학기술과 법』제7권 제2호, 75~108쪽, 전체 34쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2016.12.30
6,880원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
The U.S. s Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 is a pioneering position as a pre - sales control law for industrial chemicals. However, the legislation had been criticized for its ineffectiveness due to the fact that the government had responsibility for proving the risk of injury from products. On the other hand, the European Union enacted REACH Act in 2006, which is a landmark legislation in that it obligates chemical
manufacturers to bear responsibility for product safety. Under this background, the United States has amended the Toxic Substances Control Act in 2016 after 40 years from its enactment. The revised law still requires the government to bear responsibility for proving the hazards of the product. However, the amendment law was intended to expand the authority of government agencies to secure information on chemical substances in order to obtain chemical hazard information efficiently. The amendments also strengthened the review of existing chemicals to enhance protection of humans and the environment from the risks of chemicals.
Looking at the history of the toxicant control law, the transition from post-sale control to pre-sales control or conversion of burden of proof is highlighted. However, the fundamental motive inherent in such a change is the expansion of hazard information of chemical substances. While the types of chemicals used commercially are large, there is a time and capital limit to assessing the hazards of chemicals. As a result, only a small number of toxic chemicals s information are available, and this situation is not likely to be solved easily. One way to address this problem is to quickly share information on the hazards of chemicals in major countries (the US, Europe, Japan, etc.). In addition, a chemical substance that has already been identified in another country as a toxic chemical substance should be considered toxic substances in domestic law. Chemical Hazard Information should be shared with producers, secondary producers using them, and consumers through the Internet.
PHMG and PGH, which were used as humidifier disinfectants, were already known to be toxic to foreign countries. Even though domestic chemical producers were aware of this fact, manufacturers who made consumer products using them insisted that they did not know about it. The fact that many people using humidifier disinfectants have been injured has shown that share of hazard information of chemicals is one of the fundamental problem of chemical substance control legislation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 화학물질통제법 역사 연구의 방법론
Ⅲ. TSCA(1976년)의 탄생
Ⅳ. TSCA 개정법(2016년)의 탄생
Ⅴ. TSCA 진화의 시사점
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 법학분야 BEST
- 인공지능 판사, 과연 가능한가?
- 정치의 사법화와 사법의 정치화 : 온건하고 실용적인 헌법재판의 당위성
- 자국 우선주의 정책과 국제법상 난민⋅이민자 보호-트럼프 행정부의 미국 우선주의를 중심으로-
법학 > 법학분야 NEW
더보기최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
