- 영문명
- Digital Technology and Changes to Copyright Act in the U.K.
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 박현경(Park, hyun kyung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『과학기술과 법』제6권 제1호, 115~148쪽, 전체 34쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2015.06.30
                
                
                    6,880원
                
               
                
                
                    
                    
                        
                        
                        
                            
                        
                    
                
                
                    
            
        구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
	                    이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
 
        국문 초록
영문 초록
Professor Hargreaves was commissioned to report a review of how the IP framework supports economic growth and innovation in 2010 by Prime Minister David Cameron. The review was published in 2011 and submitted 10 recommendations to “ensure that the UK has an IP framework best suited to supporting innovation and promoting economic growth in the digital age”. His recommendations are as in the following ; making IP policies by objective evidences, protecting the U.K. IP in the aspect of international environment, copyright licensing though Digital Copyright Exchange, protecting orphan works, limits to copyright, reducing patent thickets and other obstructions to innovation, protecting the design industry, simple and speedy ways to enforce IP rights, supporting small firm access to IP advice and IP system responsive to change by IPO. In response to the report, the government had collected all sorts of opinions related to copyright, then in 2012, it published the report,
“Modernising Copyright.” The government clarified the its intention with regard to amending copyright law. According to this, the final drafts of the resulting Statutory Instruments were made in 2012. In 5. 2014, 5 areas of Regulations(Public Administration, Disability, Research, Education, Libraries and Archives) had been approved in the Parliament, so that they took effect in 6, 2014. Meanwhile the Quotation and Parody had been approved later and took effect in 10. 2014. One of the most noticeable changes is the extending limits to copyright. Especially format-shifting was not permitted under the Copyright Act 1988, but after the enforcement of regulations, format-shifting for private use becomes legal and it will help to raise using of copyright by users and develop the device manufactural industries. Furthermore, the Regulations made copyright act more simple and clear, it permits copy for private use, educational purpose and preservation purposes. Considering the development of digital technologies, it accepts newly the use of text and data for computing analysis without business purposes. In this essay, I try to examine the process of the development of copyright act in the U.K.. From the Hargreaves report to the Regulations in 2014, I think the main purpose of the amendment of the Copyright Act is to fit the IP law system for the near future environment of digital age. It fully understood the future value of IP in digital economy, so it tried to build the new IP system which would help people to make innovation. Like the U.K., Korea is suffering from depression for a long time. The innovation through the IP system would help Korea to escape this long-term depression. In this aspect, the detailed study of the process of amendment and the Regulations would offer the chance to make a comparing study between two countries and help to review the Korean IP law system.
                    목차
Ⅰ. 서론
	                       
	                          Ⅱ. 입법과정  
	                       
	                          Ⅲ. 개정주요내용
	                       
	                          Ⅳ. 영국 저작권법 개정 평가 및 전망
	                       
                    	키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 법학분야 BEST
- 인공지능 판사, 과연 가능한가?
- 정치의 사법화와 사법의 정치화 : 온건하고 실용적인 헌법재판의 당위성
- 자국 우선주의 정책과 국제법상 난민⋅이민자 보호-트럼프 행정부의 미국 우선주의를 중심으로-
법학 > 법학분야 NEW
- [스페인]검찰의 구형보다 중한 형을 선고한 판결에 대한 재판소원–헌법소원의 적법요건으로서 ‘특별한 헌법적 중요성’
- [미국]차별사건에서 다수집단에 속하는 청구인에게 추가적인 입증책임이 부과되는지 여부
- [독일]독일 내 미군기지에 예멘 공격 드론을 배치한 것이 예멘인에 대한 독일의 기본권보호의무를 위반한 것인지 여부
최근 이용한 논문
					교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
									
						 
					
				
			신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
						지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
 
					 
         
        