태권도 품새 경기에 대한 심판과 선수의 인식 비교

• 영문명: A Aware of the Comparison among Taekwondo Poomsae and Players
• 발행기관: 세계태권도문화학회
• 저자명: 정준호(Jung Jun Ho) 이영오(Lee Young O)
• 간행물 정보: 『세계태권도문화학회지』8호, 57~77쪽, 전체 21쪽
• 주제분류: 예술체육 > 체육
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.06.30

영문 초록

This study is to compare cognition for Taekwondo Poomsaecompetition between referee and athlete, and to suggest basic data in order for introducing Taekwondo Poomsae athlete and expanding the base via effective game operation of referee and transparent judgment. To achieve the goal described above, a survey targeting to Poomsae referee and athlete has been conducted (from 2013 Aug to Sept) by 3 auxiliary researchers. The survey, which was followed by explanation on this research, was conducted on the basis of Self-administration. First, most objects (referees and athletes)selected 'Generally fair'in questionfor fairness of judgment. And 'Referee's qualification' was pointed out by most referees asa reason of unfairness made by referee's Poomsae judgment, while 'Personal relationship' and 'Referee's qualification'were pointed out bymost athletes as the reason. Meanwhile, 'Very good' was selected by most referees for the judgment in comparison with the past (about 5 years ago) judgment, while 'Generally improved' was selected by most athletes. There was no statistically significantdiscrepancy in cognition for fairness between refereeand athlete. Second, 'Generally reliable' was selected by most objects (referee and athlete) for the question of reliability, showing no statistically significant difference between two groups. And 'Athlete' was pointed out by most objects (referee and athlete) as the group having the lowest reliability in terms of referee's judgment, showing statistical difference in significance level (x2 =14.541, p<.01). When it comes to question asking'If referee is admirable', most objects selected 'Generally yes', showing statistical difference in significance level (x2=9.715, p<.05). Third, for cognition of referee and athlete for misjudgment, most referees selected 'Often', while most athletes answered 'Not often', showing statistical difference in significance level (x2=11.451, p<.05). For the frequency of intentional misjudgment made by Poomsae referee, most athletes selected 'Not often', while most referee selected 'Rare', showing statistical difference in significance level (x2=26.492, p<.001).In comparison of cognition about 'Whether judgment can be reversed due to intentional misjudgment or mistake', most referee answered'Generally yes', while most athletes selected 'Not many', showing statistical difference in significance level (x2=25.893, p<.001). Fourth, when it comes tocognition of referee and athlete for factors affecting judgments, most referees pointed out 'Referee's qualification' as the obstacle for enhancing referee's judgment, while most athletes selected 'Personal relationship', showing statistical difference in significance level (x2 =23.041, p<.001). In addition, 'General' was selected by most objects (referee and athletes) as biased judgment, showing statistical difference in significance level (x2=13.730, p<.01). For the resolution to eliminate mistrust among referee and athlete, 'Fair judgment of referee' was selected by most referees, while 'Understanding each other in different point of view' was selected by most athletes, showing statistical difference in significance level (x2=28.933, p<.001). Fifth, as an improvement plan for Poomsae competition, most objects (referee and athlete) answered that 'Current method is reasonable', showing no statistical difference in significance level (x2 =28.933).As an important factors for improving fairness in judgment of referee, most objects (referee and athlete) selected 'Referee's qualification',showing statistical difference in significance level (x2=35.870, p<.001). When it comes to requirement which has to be possessed by referee, most objects (referee and athlete) pointed out 'Effort to judge in fairness', showing no statistical difference in significance level (x2=16.349, p<.001). And, for question asking required policy, most objects (referee and athlete) choose 'Post-competition referee judgment system', showing statisti

목차

Abstract

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 연구 방법

Ⅲ. 연구결과 및 논의

Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언

참고문헌

키워드

TaeKwondo Poomsae Players comparison