- 영문명
- The Study on the Main Issues and Recent Legislation related with Undue Supported Behavior
- 발행기관
- 중앙대학교 법학연구원
- 저자명
- 조성국(Cho Sung kuk)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학논문집』法學論文集 第37輯 第3號, 39~61쪽, 전체 22쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2013.12.31
5,440원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(MRFTA) of Korea prohibits the acts of unreasonably "providing specially related persons or other corporations with temporary payment, loan, manpower, real estate, securities, products, services, intangible property rights, etc., or aiding a special related person or other corporations by trading under extremely favorable terms"(Article 23, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 7).
The intention to regulate the undue supports is to prevent many problems resulting from unfair trade and economic concentration. However, there were many criticisms that the undue supported behaviors have not been regulated effectively and economic concentration is deepening in Korea. They have been discussed as a kind of economic democracy.
In 2013, the National Assembly enacted or revised several clauses in order to regulate undue supported behaviors more effectively and strongly. First, the criteria of the undue supported behaviors were less strict by changing 'extremely favorable terms' to 'quite favorable terms'. This change relieves the Korea Fair Trade Commission(KFTC) of the burden of proof. Second, KFTC does not need to prove the unfairness of trade to regulate the undue supported behaviors for special related persons. It is very difficult to prove the unfairness of trade in the undue supported behaviors for special related persons. Third, the intentional work concentration by Chaebol was prohibited. Chaebols could accumulate huge wealth through the intentional work concentration by subsidiaries. Fourth, the undue supports for subsidiaries without substantial role were prohibited. Some companies could be supported by receiving commission without substantial role by intermediating in trade between their other subsidiary and the third company.
The undue supported behaviors are related with the protection of shareholders and debtors, the prevention of the illegal transfer of wealth, fair taxation and the control of antisocial acts as well as fair trade. It is not only impossible but also undesirable to solve the issue only by one law or one policy. It is not desirable to depend too heavily on MRFTA. I think that companies should eradicate wrong practices by abiding by the commercial law for themselves.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 외국 및 타법의 규제사례
Ⅲ. 주요 쟁점 및 최근 입법동향
Ⅳ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 법학분야 BEST
- 인공지능 판사, 과연 가능한가?
- 정치의 사법화와 사법의 정치화 : 온건하고 실용적인 헌법재판의 당위성
- 자국 우선주의 정책과 국제법상 난민⋅이민자 보호-트럼프 행정부의 미국 우선주의를 중심으로-
법학 > 법학분야 NEW
- 디지털포렌식 절차에서 음란물 디지털 증거의 관련성과 문제점 - 대법원 2023도11395 판결을 중심으로
- 미성년 성폭력 피해자 진술분석 면담 영상녹화물의 증거능력에 관한 연구 - 미국의 대면권과 전문법칙 판례 변화를 중심으로
- ‘수사와 기소 분리’ 법률안에 대한 논의와 대안
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
