본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

무기설을 통해 본 무여열반의 의미

이용수  228

영문명
The meaning of anupadisesanibbana from Unanswered Question's perspectives
발행기관
한국불교연구원
저자명
황순일
간행물 정보
『불교연구』불교연구 제20집, 233~251쪽, 전체 19쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 불교학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2004.02.01
5,080

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In the early canon, the state of nirvana without a remainder of clinging was often explained through the image of a fire extinguished. An early idea of this state could be traced through one of the well-known discourses between the Buddha and Vacchagotta concerning one of the four unanswered questions: the state of the Tathagata after death. As its name suggests, the early canon did not really answer this question. Thus, there have been many attempts to fill the silence of the Buddha through clarifying this metaphor of a fire extinguished, and which was the case for F.Otto Schrader and Peter Harvey to insist the state of nirvana without a remainder of clinging cannot simply be mere non-existence, based on some passages in the Upani.ads and in the early Buddhist canon respectively. However, their suggested interpretations seem to lack one of the most important aspects of the dialogue: the methodology, or the way of thinking, underlying their conversation. The methodology used by the Buddha could be termed yoniso manasikara meaning "thinking according to the cause." The Buddha, according to Gombrich in his book, How Buddhism Began, "was not an essentialist, and in contrast to Brahmins was interested in how things worked rather than in what they were". From the modern terminology, these two ways of looking things seem to correspond to two types of methodology suggested by Karl Popper in his book, The Open Society and Its Enemies: methodological essentialism and methodological nominalism. Karl Popper explained the first, methodological essentialism, as to aim at finding out what a thing really is and at defining its true nature, by asking for example what is movement or what is an atom; whereas the second, methodological nominalism, is to aim at describing how a thing behaves in various circumstances, by asking for instance how does a planet move or under what conditions does an atom radiate light. His point according to Gombrich is that 'knowledge and understanding do not advance through asking for definitions of what things are, but through asking why they occur and how they work'. The content of yoniso manasikara could resemble modern scientific method and, as far as I am concerned, this methodological difference should be considered in interpreting the dialogue between the Buddha and Vacchagotta. There are two main concerns around this last issue of the unanswered questions: whether the Buddha accepts a certain state reachable by an enlightened one after death and on what grounds he wants this question to remain unanswered. In my opinion, the Buddha for the first matter seems to leave such a state, a kind of absolute, aside, since it is outside the range of his methodology which explains things through the causal relationship between phenomenal existents(dharma). For the second, I could say that his methodology, thinking according to the cause (yoniso manasikara), could help to account for his leaving questions on the state of the Tathagata after death unanswered.

목차

1. 서언
2. 불교의 방법론과 무기
3. 무여열반의 의미
4. 결어
참고자료
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

황순일. (2004).무기설을 통해 본 무여열반의 의미. 불교연구, 20 , 233-251

MLA

황순일. "무기설을 통해 본 무여열반의 의미." 불교연구, 20.(2004): 233-251

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제