유니온숍협정제도의 헌법적 정합성에 관한 일고찰

• 영문명: A Study of the Constitutional Conformity of “Union Shop” Agreement System
• 발행기관: 경희법학연구소
• 저자명: 강희원(Kang, Hee-Won)
• 간행물 정보: 『경희법학』제45권 제3호, 9~66쪽, 전체 58쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 민법
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.09.30

영문 초록

Korean Trade Union and Labor Relation Adjustment Act art. 81, subpar. 2, pro. allows a employer to conclude the Union Shop Agreement with his company’s labor union which is represented by more than two-thirds of laborers in a business shop. However it is a question if this provision is conformable to art. 33. Korean Constitution in which so-called the labor’s three primary rights should be guaranteed. In this essay, I am trying to revalue normatively the constitutional conformity of this proviso clause, relating it with the recent changes of Korean Labor Society. And then I am asserting that this proviso clause of the Trade Union and Labor Relation Adjustment Act art. 81, subpar. 2 should be abolished because of the violation of the constitution.

목차

l. 들어가면서

ll. 유니온숍협정 일반

lll. 우리나라 유니온숍협정의 실태

lV. 한국 노동사회의 변동

V. 노동3권의 헌법적 구조

Vl. 유니온숍협정인정론의 재검토

Vll. 결어

키워드

유니온숍 헌법정합성 노동조합 노동조합및노동관계조정법 노동삼권 적극적 단결권 소극적 단결권 노동사회 union shop constitutional conformity labor union Trade Union and Labor Relation Adjustment Act labor’s three primary rights the right to organize the right not to organize labor society.