본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

“遼陽은 옛 襄平이 아니다”

이용수 299

영문명
“Liaoyang is not the old Xiangping”
발행기관
백산학회
저자명
崔恩亨(Choi, Oun-Hyung)
간행물 정보
『백산학보』第85號, 57~82쪽, 전체 26쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 역사학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2009.12.30
이용가능 이용불가
  • sam무제한 이용권 으로 학술논문 이용이 가능합니다.
  • 이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다. 1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

It is wrong to accept what China is saying about Liaoyang being the old Xiangping without questioning, comparing, analyzing and investigating. It is believed that Xiangping came into being by King Zhao(昭. BC312-279)in the Yan dynasty of Chunqiuzhanguo(春秋戰國) and it lasted till A.D. 581, the Sui dynasty. It was known that Xiangping lasted for more than 850years. Liaoyang, where China considered as the old Xiangping was the name that came into being in the Tang(唐) dynasty. The Tang dynasty, after invading Goguryu, built Andongdouhufu(安東都護府) in the capital of Goguryu, Pyongyang. Andongdouhufu was moved to Liaodong, current Liaoyang in Tang shangyuan(上元.year 676) and it has continued to exist till now. The fact that “Liaoyang=Xiangping” is true or not can change the whole history for the east-north part of ancient China and also it can produce further error in the future. Therefore although it is little too late, analyzing and investigating of this matter are essential. The possibility that today’s Liaoyang is the old Xiangping, as mentioned above, is very low. Believing some of the records including Xin tang shu without any investigation and keeping the theory that “Liaoyang=the old Xiangping” can distort the history. It is suspected that due to the wrong record from the Xin tang shu that people started to believe that current Liaoyang from the Tang dynasty is the old Xiangping. Andongdouhufu was first built in Pyongyang but it was moved to Liaoyang and to Lulong. While it was moving, we suspect tha t Xintangshu made the mistake and recorded Liaoyang Andongdouhufu in stead of Lulong Andongdouhufu. From that record, the belief that “Liaoyang=the old Xianping” was born. The location of Xiang ping is especially important since from the Yan dynasty to Qin(秦) dynasty, it was the military city in the east side of the Great wall. Also it was located in the border of the Han dynasty and Gojoseon. There is still a debate where was the exact location of the border for Gojosun. This is one of the most sensitive issues when studying the ancient history of Korea and China. I expect this paper to activate the further study on finding Xianping’s current location.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 통용되고 있는 ‘요양=양평’설
Ⅲ. 사서에는 “양평은 현 노룡현”
Ⅳ. ‘요양=옛 양평’ 기록에 대한 검토
Ⅴ. 요양 위치 검토
Ⅵ. 결론
[Abstract]

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

崔恩亨(Choi, Oun-Hyung). (2009).“遼陽은 옛 襄平이 아니다”. 백산학보, (85), 57-82

MLA

崔恩亨(Choi, Oun-Hyung). "“遼陽은 옛 襄平이 아니다”." 백산학보, .85(2009): 57-82

sam 이용권 선택
님이 보유하신 이용권입니다.
차감하실 sam이용권을 선택하세요.