- 영문명
- Authorship of "Shi er yin yuan guan" : A Possibility of its Production in Silla
- 발행기관
- 불교학연구회
- 저자명
- 佐藤厚(Sato Atsushi)
- 간행물 정보
- 『불교학연구』제11호, 113~139쪽, 전체 27쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 불교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.08.01
국문 초록
영문 초록
Shi er yin yuan guan "十二因？？ has been known as a text of Chengguan’s 澄？（738839）, the 4th patriarch of Chinese Hua-yen school. However, there is possibility that the text was written in Silla. There are certain grounds to support the idea that from Silla Hua yen Buddhism had produced the text.
The first argument to support this hypothesis is that the text itself neither appease in any literature connected with Cheng guan’s biography nor in his writings. The important point worthy of attention in that no Chinese Buddhist scholars refered the text ever. The first appearance of connection between Cheng guan and "Shi er yin yuan guan " is found in Uichon’s 義天 (10551101) table of Buddhist scriptures, a work accomplished during the Koryo dynasty in the 11th century.
The text contains three parts in which first part explanation of twelve parts pratityasamtpada using metaphor of a big tree and river. The second part deals with how to extinguish the cause of twelve parts pratityasamtpada. The final part is explanation of three views, yin yuan guan因？？, yuan gi guan？起？, hsing gi guan性起 ？. The last part has been considered significant theory in the text. This does not, however, exist in Cheng guan’s other writings. It should be noted that in exists only in Silla Huayen writings.
On the basis of aforementioned arguments, it is most likely that "Shi er yin yuan guan" was produced by a Silla Huayen scholar.
In this situation, there still remains a pertinent question why did Uichon consider this text Chengguan as the author of "Shi er yin yuan guan"? It is still a very controversial question in korean Buddhist historiography. There is another historical assumption that Uichon could have considered ‘guansi’？師as ‘Chengguan’ 澄？ who appears in “Popkyedokichonsurok”法界？記叢？？, a text produced in Korea.
The first argument to support this hypothesis is that the text itself neither appease in any literature connected with Cheng guan’s biography nor in his writings. The important point worthy of attention in that no Chinese Buddhist scholars refered the text ever. The first appearance of connection between Cheng guan and "Shi er yin yuan guan " is found in Uichon’s 義天 (10551101) table of Buddhist scriptures, a work accomplished during the Koryo dynasty in the 11th century.
The text contains three parts in which first part explanation of twelve parts pratityasamtpada using metaphor of a big tree and river. The second part deals with how to extinguish the cause of twelve parts pratityasamtpada. The final part is explanation of three views, yin yuan guan因？？, yuan gi guan？起？, hsing gi guan性起 ？. The last part has been considered significant theory in the text. This does not, however, exist in Cheng guan’s other writings. It should be noted that in exists only in Silla Huayen writings.
On the basis of aforementioned arguments, it is most likely that "Shi er yin yuan guan" was produced by a Silla Huayen scholar.
In this situation, there still remains a pertinent question why did Uichon consider this text Chengguan as the author of "Shi er yin yuan guan"? It is still a very controversial question in korean Buddhist historiography. There is another historical assumption that Uichon could have considered ‘guansi’？師as ‘Chengguan’ 澄？ who appears in “Popkyedokichonsurok”法界？記叢？？, a text produced in Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 소재
Ⅱ. 텍스트와 유통과정
Ⅲ. 내용과 사상
Ⅳ. (C) 부분의 검토신라 화엄학과의 관련성
Ⅴ. 저자를 둘러싼 可能性과 問題点
Ⅵ. 결어
〈參考文獻〉
영문초록
Ⅱ. 텍스트와 유통과정
Ⅲ. 내용과 사상
Ⅳ. (C) 부분의 검토신라 화엄학과의 관련성
Ⅴ. 저자를 둘러싼 可能性과 問題点
Ⅵ. 결어
〈參考文獻〉
영문초록
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!