- 영문명
- A comparative study of isokinetic muscular Strength among ice-hockey athletics"s positions
- 발행기관
- 경희대학교 스포츠과학연구원
- 저자명
- 박영균(Park young-Kyun) 전종국(Chun Jung-Kook) 이재문(Lee Jae-Mun)
- 간행물 정보
- 『체육학논문집』제29집, 187~202쪽, 전체 16쪽
- 주제분류
- 예술체육 > 체육
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2001.12.01
국문 초록
영문 초록
The purpose of this study was to compare the isokinetic muscular among ice-hockey athletics"s positions(FW, DF, GK). For this purpose, the subjects were 29 athletes(FW 10, DF 10, GK 9), and the isokinetic strength were tested by knee and shoulderat. Knee tests processed at 5 times to 60°/sec, 5 times to 120°/sec, 20 times to 180°/sec, and shoulder tests processed at 5 times to 60°/sec, 90°/sec, 120°/sec with the CYBEX NORM system. The test items were peak torque, total work, average power, and H/Q ratio. The results of this study were as follows;
1. For both knee extension and flexion peak torque, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was significant difference between DF and FW in extension, and between DF/GK and FW in flexion.
2. For both knee extension total work, showed DF, GK, FW order and there was significant difference between DF/GK and FW in extension And no significant difference among positions in flexion.
3. For both knee extension and flexion average power, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was significant difference between DF and FW.
4. For knee H/Q ratio, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was no significant difference among positions.
5. For both shoulder extension and flexion peak torque, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was significant difference between DF and FW.
6. For both shoulder extension and flexion peak torque, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was significant difference between DF and FW.
7. For both shoulder extension and flexion peak torque, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was significant difference between DF and FW in flexion. But, no significant difference among positions in extension.
8. For shoulder H/Q ratio, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was no significant difference among positions.
1. For both knee extension and flexion peak torque, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was significant difference between DF and FW in extension, and between DF/GK and FW in flexion.
2. For both knee extension total work, showed DF, GK, FW order and there was significant difference between DF/GK and FW in extension And no significant difference among positions in flexion.
3. For both knee extension and flexion average power, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was significant difference between DF and FW.
4. For knee H/Q ratio, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was no significant difference among positions.
5. For both shoulder extension and flexion peak torque, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was significant difference between DF and FW.
6. For both shoulder extension and flexion peak torque, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was significant difference between DF and FW.
7. For both shoulder extension and flexion peak torque, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was significant difference between DF and FW in flexion. But, no significant difference among positions in extension.
8. For shoulder H/Q ratio, showed DF, GK, FW order, and there was no significant difference among positions.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 고찰
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 고찰
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!