공황장애에서 Paroxetine 치료반응을 예측할 수 있는 생물학적 지표

• 영문명: Biological Markers that Predict the Treatment Response of Paroxetine in Panic Disorder
• 발행기관: 대한신경정신의학회
• 저자명: 박주언 유범희
• 간행물 정보: 『신경정신의학』제44권 제2호, 238~246쪽, 전체 9쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 정신과학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2005.03.30

영문 초록

Objectives：Previons studies reported altered beta-adrenergic receptor (βAR) responsiveness in panic disorder, but few studies reported to see the effect of pharmacotherapy on βAR function in panic patients. This investigation examined βAR responsiveness in patients with panic disorder before and after pharmacotherapy with paroxetine. Methods：After assessment using the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule for DSM-IV, 27 acute panic patients whose illness duration did not exceed 1 year were assigned to 12 weeks of paroxetine treatment. Twenty seven normal control subjects with no previous history of major medical and psychiatric illnesses were matched by age, sex, exercise, and body mass index. The Hamilton rating scale for anxiety (HAM-A), Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D), Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory-State (STAI-S) and Trait (STAI-T), acute panic inventory (API), anxiety sensitivity index (ASI), and Beck depression index (BDI) were performed to assess clinical states in the panic patients before and after treatment. The HAM-A, HAM-D, STAI-S and STAI-T, and BDI were also performed in the normal control subjects. We measured the βAR density (Bmax), affinity (1/Kd), and sensitivity (cyclic AMP ratio of isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP to basal cAMP) in all subjects. Results：Panic patients showed much lower scores of the HAM-A, STAI-S, STAI-T, API, ASI, HAM-D, and BDI after 12 weeks of paroxetine treatment than those before the treatment. There was no significant difference in the means of Bmax and cAMP ratio between control subjects and panic patients before and after the treatment. However, pretreatment Kd (R2=0.314, β=-0.876, p=0.001) and Bmax (R2=0.230, β=-0.575, p=0.019) significantly accounted for API scores after the treatment and change of Bmax according to the treatment accounted for the improvement of anxiety sensitivity (R2= 0.353, β=0.594, p=0.015). The pretreatment Kd value was significantly higher in the panic patients compared with that of control subjects (78.35±26.20 vs. 59.15±29.33, p=0.014), which was significantly reduced after the treatment (79.43± 26.83 vs. 56.38±28.79, p=0.002). The pretreatment Kd value significantly accounted for the improvement of API scores (R2=0.316, β=0.562, p=0.029) and the decrease in trait anxiety (R2=0.246, β=-0.513, p=0.025). Conclusion：In acute panic patients, only βAR affinity was reduced before the treatment, which was contrary to our expectation. Decreased βAR affinity was normalized after paroxetine treatment. Decreased βAR affinity and increased βAR density before the treatment predicted good treatment response in acute panic patients. Thus, βAR affinity and density could be useful biological markers that predict the treatment response of paroxetine in panic disorder.

목차

서 론

방 법

결 과

고 찰

결 론

REFERENCES

키워드

Panic disorder Beta-adrenergic receptors Treatment response Paroxetine