라틴아메리카 국제중재의 최근 발전경향과 특징

• 영문명: Recent Trends and Characteristics of International Arbitration in Latin American Countries
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 조희문
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제18권 제1호, 97~119쪽, 전체 23쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.03.30

영문 초록

The reluctance of Latin American countries to practice international arbitration is not a new topic in international law. This reluctance historically based on Calvo Doctrine provoked not only the absence of Latin American countries from the major international commercial arbitration conventions, but obsolete national arbitration legislation. Recently, however, these countries have undertaken major steps showing that the region is no longer reluctant to practice international commercial arbitration. Most Latin American countries have ratified the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards ( New York Convention ), the 1965 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes ( Washington Convention ) and the 1975 Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration ( Panama Convention ). The majority of Latin American countries have also modified and adapted their national legislation on arbitration to the UNCITRAL model law. Even judiciary has been following this pro-arbitration. This article will focus on some of these factors provoking the acceptance of international commercial arbitration in Latin America to trace the common trends and characteristics in an attempt to understand better how international arbitration set on its place firmly. For this purpose we selected five countries, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Mexico and Venezuela, to analyse legislations and jurisprudence. Latin America is ready to challenge any obstacles to promote arbitration as alternative methods of judicial resolution. There is an ever-increasing number of international arbitration in Latin America. Both practitioners and judiciary have shown desires to promote the resolution of disputes by arbitration and used the legal instruments to ensure that process interpreting and applying legislations for pro-arbitration. Even there remains Calvo Doctrine s culture in Latin America still now, it should be certain this culture will disappear from the conduct of international arbitration.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 중재에 관한 다자협약의 가입현황을 통해 본 라틴아메리카 국가들의 태도변화

Ⅲ. 라틴아메리카 주요 국가들의 중재법 경향

Ⅳ. 라틴 아메리카 각국 국내법원들의 중재에 대한 태도

Ⅴ. 결어

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

라틴아메리카 브라질 아르헨티나 칠레 멕시코 베네주엘라 국제상사중재 중재법 중재판례 법원 Latin America Brazil Argentina Chile Mexico Venezuela International Commercial Arbitration Arbitration Law Jurisprudence Court