학술논문
자치사회주의의 실험 -‘붉은 비인(Rotes Wien)’의 주거정책을 중심으로 (1918-1934)
이용수 162
- 영문명
- The Experiment of Municipal Socialism: Red Vienna Project 1918-1934
- 발행기관
- 한국독일사학회
- 저자명
- 정현백(Hyun Back Chung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『독일연구』Vol.14, 145~177쪽, 전체 33쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 역사학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.30
6,760원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
The “Red Vienna” campaign carried out by Austro-Marxists between 1918 and 1924 was an unprecedented experiment of housing program never seen in the world. Austrian socialists chose “the third way” amid the Bolshevik Revolution and revisionism of the Social Democratic Party of Germany. Caught in Vienna when Christian conservatives took over the federal government in national elections, the Austro-Marxists wanted a way out through municipal socialism. In other words, they wanted control constituency using political clout and to create “new people” through long-term cultural and educational movements, and thereby make Austria a socialistic nation through democracy. To this end, communal houses of Red Vienna were the steppingstone.
Nevertheless, this legacy of the project also drew much criticism in which it ignored dynamism of the masses, was a political choice as a alternative of reformism, revealed a severe gap between the public and leaders, and showed a paradox between verbal radicalism and practice of reformism in the socialist party. In short, the Red Vienna housing program was only a mere improved provision within capitalism. There is also a view that the Austro-Marxists could not escape the “nest mentality (Lagermentalität)” and were satisfied with its subculture as in the case of German Social Democratic Party. Another criticism is that the communal residents marred public s autonomy by creating a modern way of discipline. Especially from the gender perspective, the program epitomized male-centeredness and patriarchy where socialist culture promises the creation of “new people”.
Although Red Vienna offered both possibilities and limits, the most important contribution of this project was the recognition of the importance of reproduction in the creation of political awareness and consequent changes. It also brought about a tremendous improvement in the workers quality of life in the area of housing, significantly contributed in the expansion of political and cultural hegemony of workers, and suggested a model of progressive reform politics. It also contributed in the modernization of workers, which is a factor training them as modern people. Nonetheless, it was not enough as an alternative model in all areas of life. In other words, it did not offer specific details for new hegemony and showed the limit of powerless culture and the limit of cultureless power.
However, the ultimate failure of Red Vienna should not be misunderstood as the failure or limit of this program itself. Many analyses showed that Red Vienna was not spared by economic hardship of Vienna and grim political perspective of Fascists taking over the entire Europe amid the fear of Bolshevism. Job creation and economic development in Vienna were not decreasing at the time when the full-scale public housing project was underway. However, Red Vienna faltered early because big businesses that were suppose to provide financial basis in local governments were very critical of its project.
This tragic lapsing historic event did not fade away but aided the Austria s Socialist party to regain its power since 1945.
목차
Ⅰ. 오스트리아 사회민주주의의 새로운 실험
Ⅱ. 비인 자치정부의 주거정책
Ⅲ. 노동자가 경험한 비인의 주거공동체
Ⅳ. 역사적 득실
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
