학술논문
선교 패러다임의 비교연구
이용수 318
- 영문명
- A Comparative Study on the Mission Paradigms: Between Mission of the Church and Mission of the Mission Society
- 발행기관
- 한국선교신학회
- 저자명
- 한국일(Kook Il Han)
- 간행물 정보
- 『선교신학』제33집, 231~265쪽, 전체 35쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 기독교신학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2013.07.30
7,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
The Korean Church is well-known as the Church which conducts missionary works. Despite the short church-history, the Korean Church has not only considerate passions and dedicated attitudes toward Mission, but also human resources and material resources needed to the missionary works. Thus it goes without saying that the Korean Church stands on the rank of countries that are responsible for the World Mission. The Korean Church’s Mission has several distinct features, which are church-centered, Denominational Mission Department-centered sending-missionaries and then not setting up enough infra-structure. Upright Mission is accompanied by administrating and caring missionaries as well as gathering and choosing suitable people, sending and supporting them as missionaries, and making them settle in the mission field and grasping their missionary works. However, the Korean Church’s Mission is, so to speak, to be doing ‘Sending-centered Mission.’ Mission is recognized only to send missionaries and supporting their living expenses. Because of these reasons, Denominational Mission Department or Missionary Society beyond the Denomination don’t consider setting up intra-structure as the principal assignment.
Currently, the Korean Church’s missionary model seems the Church-centered Mission model but, in fact, sending missionaries is carried on each church-centered events, for which primary structures and systems needed in conducting the missionary works are not equipped. Each church-centered sending-missionaries and Mission on the basis of sponsorship structure causes various problems in the choice of missionaries and their missionary activities. In many cases, to choose missionaries and to support them is done impromptu rather than designedly. There is no long-term missionary policy to supervise, manage, and take care of missionaries. The responsibility of all the missionary works is left to the missionaries alone.
In order to perform the right Mission continuously, it is not sending many missionaries but establishing and operating frames and structures to support the working missionaries systematically that is the most urgent task. This article is to suggest the real alternative by recognizing the problems of Mission and realizing heartfelt the need of the infrastructure on Mission. After seizing pros and cons between each church-centered Mission model and Mission Society-centered Mission model, it is to search for solutions on structural problems which have been revealed in each church-centered Mission system in Korea Church now.
목차
서론
1. 근대 서구교회의 선교 구조: 선교회 중심 구조
2. 한국교회의 선교 파송, 관리 및 감독구조에 나타난 문제점: 개교회 중심 구조
3. 교회(Modality)와 선교회(Sodality)의 상관관계
4. 한국교회 상황에 적합한 선교구조: 교회와 선교회의 상호 긴밀한 상호보완관계
Abstract
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
인문학 > 기독교신학분야 BEST
- 영재고를 졸업한 대학생의 내러티브 정체성에 관한 연구
- 학령기 자폐스펙트럼장애 아동의 상호작용 발달 놀이치료(IDP) 사례연구
- 퍼펫을 활용한 가족 놀이치료 단일 사례연구 : 이혼 가정을 대상으로
인문학 > 기독교신학분야 NEW
- Returning to the God-Talk after Atheism: Levinas and Bonhoeffer
- A Study on Kim Chai Choon’s Understanding of Religion
- Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology Vol.43 Contents
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
