高麗時期의 中國史 認識

• 영문명: The Understanding of Chinese History in Koryo Dynasty
• 발행기관: 한국사학사학회
• 저자명: 조성을(Cho, Sung-Eul)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국사학사학보』제16권, 5~34쪽, 전체 30쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2007.12.30

영문 초록

First, Samkuksaki thought that there were two kinds of official beginning of new king. The one is to begin with the next month, and the other is to begin with the next year.Second, Samkuksaki used Chinese History Books to justify to follow the native naming of Silla Kings.Third, Samkuksaki was very critical of female Emperors in Chinese History. Fourth, Samkuksaki used Chinese History Books to criticize to yield the crown to his younger brother instead of his son. Fifth, Samkuksaki thought that the Confucian Civilization began by Kija in Korean History. Sixth, Samkuksaki used Chinese History Books to criticize the betrayers in Paekche History. Seventh, Samkuksaki adopted the official Calendar of Chinese Dynasties and did not recognize Korean own calendar. Eighth, Samkuksaki used Chinese History Books to justify to record mysterious stories in the Book. Ninth, Samkuksaki thought that Wei-Dynasty was the only legitimate one in the Three Kingdoms Period of Chinese History. Tenth, Samkukyousa adopted the more simple system of dynasties about Chinese History. Eleventh, Cheuangunki is more close to Suma Kuang than Chou Shi in the legitimate Theory of History.

목차

1. 序言

2. 『三國史記』의 中國史 認識

3. 『三國遺事』의 中國史 認識

4. 『帝王韻紀』의 中國史 認識

5. 結語

키워드

三國史記 三國遺事 稱元法帝王韻紀 儒敎 正統論 中國史體系 年號 Samkuksaki Samkukyousa Cheuangunki Official Beginning of New King Confucianism Legitimacy Theory of History Legitimate Dynasties of Chinese History Official Calendar of Dynasty Suma Kuang Chou Shi