학술논문
인적자원관리와 조직 성과간의 관계에 관한 연구 - 인적자원관리 성과로서 종업원 태도의 매개효과를 중심으로
이용수 4,830
- 영문명
- A Study on the Relationships between HRM and Organizational Outcomes : Mediating Effects of Employee Attitude as an HRM Performance
- 발행기관
- 한국인사조직학회
- 저자명
- 김기태(Kitae Kim) 조봉순(Bongsoon Cho)
- 간행물 정보
- 『인사조직연구』인사·조직연구 제16권 제1호, 115~157쪽, 전체 43쪽
- 주제분류
- 경제경영 > 경영학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.03.30
7,960원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
본 연구는 인적자원관리가 조직의 성과와 어떻게 관련되어 있는지를 확인하기 위하여, 인적자원관리의 결과로 나타나는 산출물을 인적자원관리의 대상인 조직구성원과 관련된 성과지표인 ‘인적자원관리 성과(HRM Outcome)’와 기업의 최종적인 성과지표인 ‘조직 성과(Organizational Outcome)’로 구분하고, 인적자원관리는 일차적으로 인적자원관리 성과에 직접 영향을 미치고, 인적자원관리 성과는 최종적으로 조직 성과에 영향을 미친다는 연구모형을 제시하였다. 이러한 이론적인 모형을 검정하기 위하여 한국직업능력개발원이 2005년 실시한 인적자본 기업패널 조사결과와 한국신용평가의 재무자료를 활용하였으며, 299개 제조업의 9,783명의 응답이 분석에 포함되었다. 연구결과 인적자원관리 제도 중 선발관리의 엄격성, 평가방법의 다양성, 교육훈련에 대한 투자, 그리고 보상수준 및 인센티브는 인적자원관리 성과에 영향을 미치며, 인적자원관리 성과는 조직의 성과에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 이론적 및 실무적 시사점과 향후 연구 과제를 제시하였다.
영문 초록
Just as studies on the relationship between Human Resource Management (HRM) practices and firm performance by HR scholars have been expanding for the past twenty years, major criticisms have been addressed on the following issues. First, the outcome of HRM practice was mostly evaluated by financial measures. Second, the relationship between HRM practice and firm performance was investigated without providing sufficient explanation on the process how or why both are related. This paper aims to answer the two criticisms. Its main purpose is thus two-fold. First, the study measures firm performance from the employees’ perspective along with the financial aspect. As HRM is a system or practice that directly affects the attitudes, behaviors, and performance of employees, it is logical to see how HRM has an impact on employee attitudes and behaviors that we call ‘HRM outcome’ in contrast to the ‘organizational outcome’ that captures the financial performance at the firm level. Second, the study provides and testsa model that delves into the black box of HR, i.e., the way HRM contributes to the firm performance. We suggest that HRM influences firm performance mediated by HRM outcome that is measured by employees’ positive work attitudes. In other words, this model explains that HRM directly affects attitudes and behaviors of employees that, in turn, have a subsequent impact on firm performance.
Based on the previous studies in strategic human resource management, we draw several hypotheses on the relationship between HRM practice and HRM outcome as follows;
H 1-1. HRM practice that provides job security is positively related with employees’ positive attitudes.
H 1-2. Selectivity in recruiting and employee selection is positively related with employees’ positive attitudes.
H 1-3. HRM practice that adopts diverse evaluation methods is positively related with employees’ positive attitudes.
H 1-4. Investment in employee training and development is positively related with employees’ positive attitudes.
H 1-5. Amount of compensation and incentive are positively related with employees’ positive attitudes.
From the theories and ample evidence in the field of organizational behavior and I/O Psychology, we draw several hypotheses on the relationships between HRM outcome and organizational outcome as follows;
H 2-1. Employees’ positive attitudes are negatively related with employee turnover.
H 2-2. Employees’ positive attitudes are positively related with firm performance.
H 3. Employee turnover is negatively related with firm performance.
To test the above mentioned hypotheses, we used Human Capital Corporate Panel Survey (HCCP) data collected by the Korean Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET) at 2005 and KISLINE data from the Korea Information Services(KIS). Company HRM practices and employee attitude data were selected from HCCP and firm performance data were from KISLINE. HCCP dataset consists of a corporate survey on corporation and business place and an employee survey on employees. Corporate survey includes external factors such as market and change of technology, management strategy, HRM, structure of manpower, and HRD. Employee survey includes participation in HRD of the management/production/service/core professional job, level of skillfulness, and the process of skill formation. HCCP 2005 data were collected from 14,000 employees of 454 Korean corporations. Data on HRM practice were collected in 2004, and data on HRM Outcome and firm performance were collected in 2005.
To reduce any possible industry effect, we excluded companies of financial services and other services industry from the original dataset. Final sample is composed of 9,783 employees of 299 companies in manufacturing industries.
Based on the previous studies in strategic human resource management, we draw several hypotheses on the relationship between HRM practice and HRM outcome as follows;
H 1-1. HRM practice that provides job security is positively related with employees’ positive attitudes.
H 1-2. Selectivity in recruiting and employee selection is positively related with employees’ positive attitudes.
H 1-3. HRM practice that adopts diverse evaluation methods is positively related with employees’ positive attitudes.
H 1-4. Investment in employee training and development is positively related with employees’ positive attitudes.
H 1-5. Amount of compensation and incentive are positively related with employees’ positive attitudes.
From the theories and ample evidence in the field of organizational behavior and I/O Psychology, we draw several hypotheses on the relationships between HRM outcome and organizational outcome as follows;
H 2-1. Employees’ positive attitudes are negatively related with employee turnover.
H 2-2. Employees’ positive attitudes are positively related with firm performance.
H 3. Employee turnover is negatively related with firm performance.
To test the above mentioned hypotheses, we used Human Capital Corporate Panel Survey (HCCP) data collected by the Korean Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET) at 2005 and KISLINE data from the Korea Information Services(KIS). Company HRM practices and employee attitude data were selected from HCCP and firm performance data were from KISLINE. HCCP dataset consists of a corporate survey on corporation and business place and an employee survey on employees. Corporate survey includes external factors such as market and change of technology, management strategy, HRM, structure of manpower, and HRD. Employee survey includes participation in HRD of the management/production/service/core professional job, level of skillfulness, and the process of skill formation. HCCP 2005 data were collected from 14,000 employees of 454 Korean corporations. Data on HRM practice were collected in 2004, and data on HRM Outcome and firm performance were collected in 2005.
To reduce any possible industry effect, we excluded companies of financial services and other services industry from the original dataset. Final sample is composed of 9,783 employees of 299 companies in manufacturing industries.
목차
〈초록〉
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 문헌연구
Ⅲ. 가설 설정
Ⅳ. 자료 및 변수 측정
Ⅴ. 분석 결과
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 문헌연구
Ⅲ. 가설 설정
Ⅳ. 자료 및 변수 측정
Ⅴ. 분석 결과
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
경제경영 > 경영학분야 BEST
- 근로시간 단축(주 4일제) 관련 글로벌 동향 분석과 변화 방향 제언
- 소비자의 ESG경영요구가 ESG경영지지에 미치는 영향
- 직무만족, 조직몰입, 성과, 이직의도 간의 관련성 - 문헌고찰 및 메타분석
경제경영 > 경영학분야 NEW
- 일류기업(Great Company Research) 제2권 제1호 목차
- 다함께 돌봄사업 홍보영상에 대한 브랜드 포지셔닝 연구
- An International Comparative Analysis of Brand Value: Korean Ginseng and Changbai Mountain Ginseng
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
