학술논문
改名許可의 要件 - 대법원 2005. 11. 16.자 2005스26 결정(公 2006상, 35)
이용수 201
- 영문명
- The requirements for the change of given name
- 발행기관
- 한국가족법학회
- 저자명
- 윤진수(Jinsu Yune)
- 간행물 정보
- 『가족법연구』家族法硏究 第21卷 2號, 85~120쪽, 전체 36쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.07.30
7,120원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
The decision of the Korean Supreme Court on November 16, 2005 declared that the change of given name should be granted if there is an adequate reason and it is not an abuse of right. This decision was welcomed by many because it has expanded the freedom to change the given name. But it is not clear why there should be an adequate reason for change of given name.
This article surveys the discussions on this problem in Korea, makes a comparative analysis, and concludes that the requirement of adequate reason is unnecessary because of the following reasons.
First, the Korean statutory law prescribes no such requirement.
Second, in view of the fact that the freedom to change one’s given name belongs to the human right guaranteed by Constitution, there should be a compelling reason to restrict such freedom.
Consequently, the petition to change one’s given name should be always granted unless there is a special circumstances that make the petition an abuse of the right.
It seems that after this decision the Korean courts require no adequate reason also practically.
This article surveys the discussions on this problem in Korea, makes a comparative analysis, and concludes that the requirement of adequate reason is unnecessary because of the following reasons.
First, the Korean statutory law prescribes no such requirement.
Second, in view of the fact that the freedom to change one’s given name belongs to the human right guaranteed by Constitution, there should be a compelling reason to restrict such freedom.
Consequently, the petition to change one’s given name should be always granted unless there is a special circumstances that make the petition an abuse of the right.
It seems that after this decision the Korean courts require no adequate reason also practically.
목차
〈事實關係 및 大法院 決定〉
〈硏究〉
〈追記〉
《참고문헌》
〈硏究〉
〈追記〉
《참고문헌》
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 법학분야 BEST
- 인공지능 판사, 과연 가능한가?
- 정치의 사법화와 사법의 정치화 : 온건하고 실용적인 헌법재판의 당위성
- 자국 우선주의 정책과 국제법상 난민⋅이민자 보호-트럼프 행정부의 미국 우선주의를 중심으로-
법학 > 법학분야 NEW
더보기최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
