학술논문
교회의 분열과 재산귀속에 관한 판례법리의 변천 - 대상판결 : 대법원 2006. 4. 20. 선고 2004다37775 전원합의체 판결
이용수 193
- 영문명
- The Problem of Determining the Ownership of the Properties of a Church caused by the Schism of the Church
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 金敏圭(Kim Min-Kyu)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第23卷 第3號, 191~228쪽, 전체 38쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.02.28
7,360원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
Supreme Court on April 20, 2006( No. 2004Da37775 Unanimously Agreed Verdict ) on the property ownership caused by the schism of a church. It also aims to illuminate the change process of the relevant cases and the development of a theory.
According to the aforementioned Supreme Court verdict, the split of a church is not admitted. In addition, when the religious sect of a church is changed, it is judged that the properties of the church would belong to the joint ownership ( Gesamteigentum in Germany) of the remained church members the seceded members from the church cannot hold the property rights.
However, the verdict of the Supreme Court has some problems:
(1) The dominating jurisprudential theory has taken a position that it is inevitable to acknowledge the schism of a church. Therefore, the aforementioned Supreme Court verdict is purely a jurisprudential interpretation without considering the peculiarity of a religion.
(2) With regard to the properties of a church, there are several cases; it can be registered as a juridical foundation or it can be in the form of a trust or an estate in trust. Since the Supreme Court verdict considers only the churches in the form of an incorporated association, it cannot be generalized as a standard to solve the problems of appointing properties of a church after its split.
(3) The reasons of a split of a church can be classified into two cases: the schism can be originated from a religious conflict caused by divergent doctrines or methods of church service. Or it can be originated from a depravity of the clergy. Particularly in the latter case, if the reverend still belongs to the church, the seceded members of the church will lose its foundation of properties and facilities.
Therefore, with regard to the determining the ownership of the properties of a church caused by a split of the church, it may be desirable to make a judgment after considering both realistic and jurisprudential analysis of each individual church.
According to the aforementioned Supreme Court verdict, the split of a church is not admitted. In addition, when the religious sect of a church is changed, it is judged that the properties of the church would belong to the joint ownership ( Gesamteigentum in Germany) of the remained church members the seceded members from the church cannot hold the property rights.
However, the verdict of the Supreme Court has some problems:
(1) The dominating jurisprudential theory has taken a position that it is inevitable to acknowledge the schism of a church. Therefore, the aforementioned Supreme Court verdict is purely a jurisprudential interpretation without considering the peculiarity of a religion.
(2) With regard to the properties of a church, there are several cases; it can be registered as a juridical foundation or it can be in the form of a trust or an estate in trust. Since the Supreme Court verdict considers only the churches in the form of an incorporated association, it cannot be generalized as a standard to solve the problems of appointing properties of a church after its split.
(3) The reasons of a split of a church can be classified into two cases: the schism can be originated from a religious conflict caused by divergent doctrines or methods of church service. Or it can be originated from a depravity of the clergy. Particularly in the latter case, if the reverend still belongs to the church, the seceded members of the church will lose its foundation of properties and facilities.
Therefore, with regard to the determining the ownership of the properties of a church caused by a split of the church, it may be desirable to make a judgment after considering both realistic and jurisprudential analysis of each individual church.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가면서
Ⅱ. 연구대상판결
Ⅲ. 종전 판례의 검토
Ⅳ. 검토과제
Ⅴ. 결론
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 연구대상판결
Ⅲ. 종전 판례의 검토
Ⅳ. 검토과제
Ⅴ. 결론
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 미국 불법행위 법리에서의 안전벨트 항변
- 附錄
- 해상화물운송장에 대한 법적고찰
- 교회의 분열과 재산귀속에 관한 판례법리의 변천 - 대상판결 : 대법원 2006. 4. 20. 선고 2004다37775 전원합의체 판결
- 해지환급금청구를 위한 제3채권자의 보험계약해지
- 착오규정의 개정시안에 따른 비정상적인 의사표시의 체계변화 및 농담으로 한 의사표시의 취급
- 미국계약법의 구조와 이해
- 意思表示의 主觀的 構成要素
- 저작인접권자의 공연권 도입 여부에 대한 고찰 - 음반제작자를 중심으로
- 미국계약법연구서설 - 그 구조와 현대적 의의
- 의사의 설명의무에 관한 최근 판례의 동향과 그 비판적 고찰
- 民法 總則編 제5장(법률행위) 제1절(총칙)과 제2절(의사표시)에 관한 개정방향
- 영미법상 Consideration 법리와 계약의 쌍무성
- 민법 제393조와 불법행위법에서의 예견가능성
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 법학분야 BEST
- 인공지능 판사, 과연 가능한가?
- 정치의 사법화와 사법의 정치화 : 온건하고 실용적인 헌법재판의 당위성
- 자국 우선주의 정책과 국제법상 난민⋅이민자 보호-트럼프 행정부의 미국 우선주의를 중심으로-
법학 > 법학분야 NEW
더보기최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
