학술논문
民法 總則編 제5장(법률행위) 제1절(총칙)과 제2절(의사표시)에 관한 개정방향
이용수 188
- 영문명
- Amendment Proposal Relating Civil Act Part Ⅰ Chapter Ⅴ Section 1 and 2
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 강태성(Kang Tae-Seong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第23卷 第3號, 147~190쪽, 전체 44쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.02.28
8,080원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
In this thesis, I investigate problems in the Civil Act Part Ⅰ(General Provisions) Chapter Ⅴ(Juristic Acts) Section 1(General Provisions) and 2(Declaration of Intention). And, I propose rational amendments that these problems do not exit.
Ⅰ. The Amendment of Juristic Acts Which Is the Title of Civil Act Part Ⅰ Chapter Ⅴ
Accurately speaking, This Chapter Ⅴ is consist of the provisions on the declaration of intention. Therefore, it is right to change Juristic Acts(the title of this Chapter Ⅴ) into Declaration of Intention.
Ⅱ. The Amendment of the Provisions in Civil Act Part Ⅰ Chapter Ⅴ Section 1
I investigate problems in Civil Act Article 103104105106. And, I propose reasonable rational amendments on this Articles. Especially, it is right to amend Civil Act Article 103 as following.
Civil Act Article 103 (Declaration of Intention Contrary to Social Order) A declaration of intention contrary good morals and other social order shall be null and void.
Ⅲ. The Amendment of Provisions in Civil Act Part Ⅰ Chapter Ⅴ Section 2
1. It is right to change Declaration of Intention(the title of this Chapter Ⅴ) into Defective Declaration of Intention.
2. I investigate problems in Civil Act Article 107108109110. And, I propose reasonable amendments on these Articles. Especially, it is right to amend Civil Act Article 109 as following.
Civil Act Article 109 (Declaration of Intention by Mistake) ① A declaration of intention may be voidable, in the case that the declarant did not recognize the inconsistency of his intention and declaration. But, if there has been the gross negligence of the declarant on the inconsistency, he shall not claim it to be voidable.
② The voidance of a declaration of intention as mentioned in the preceding paragraph cannot be set up against a third person acting in good faith.
③ The two preceding paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis in the case that a gross mistake exits in the motive of declaration of intention. 3. I propose amendment of Civil Act Article 111∼113. Especially, I change numbers of I these Articles into Article 106-2∼106-4
3. I propose amendment of Civil Act Article 111∼113. Especially, I change numbers of I these Articles into Article 106-2∼106-4.
Ⅰ. The Amendment of Juristic Acts Which Is the Title of Civil Act Part Ⅰ Chapter Ⅴ
Accurately speaking, This Chapter Ⅴ is consist of the provisions on the declaration of intention. Therefore, it is right to change Juristic Acts(the title of this Chapter Ⅴ) into Declaration of Intention.
Ⅱ. The Amendment of the Provisions in Civil Act Part Ⅰ Chapter Ⅴ Section 1
I investigate problems in Civil Act Article 103104105106. And, I propose reasonable rational amendments on this Articles. Especially, it is right to amend Civil Act Article 103 as following.
Civil Act Article 103 (Declaration of Intention Contrary to Social Order) A declaration of intention contrary good morals and other social order shall be null and void.
Ⅲ. The Amendment of Provisions in Civil Act Part Ⅰ Chapter Ⅴ Section 2
1. It is right to change Declaration of Intention(the title of this Chapter Ⅴ) into Defective Declaration of Intention.
2. I investigate problems in Civil Act Article 107108109110. And, I propose reasonable amendments on these Articles. Especially, it is right to amend Civil Act Article 109 as following.
Civil Act Article 109 (Declaration of Intention by Mistake) ① A declaration of intention may be voidable, in the case that the declarant did not recognize the inconsistency of his intention and declaration. But, if there has been the gross negligence of the declarant on the inconsistency, he shall not claim it to be voidable.
② The voidance of a declaration of intention as mentioned in the preceding paragraph cannot be set up against a third person acting in good faith.
③ The two preceding paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis in the case that a gross mistake exits in the motive of declaration of intention. 3. I propose amendment of Civil Act Article 111∼113. Especially, I change numbers of I these Articles into Article 106-2∼106-4
3. I propose amendment of Civil Act Article 111∼113. Especially, I change numbers of I these Articles into Article 106-2∼106-4.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 민법 제1편 제5장의 제목 “법률행위”의 개정
Ⅲ. 민법 제1편 제5장 제1절(총칙)의 규정들의 개정
Ⅳ. 민법 제1편 제5장 제2절(意思表示)의 규정들의 개정
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 민법 제1편 제5장의 제목 “법률행위”의 개정
Ⅲ. 민법 제1편 제5장 제1절(총칙)의 규정들의 개정
Ⅳ. 민법 제1편 제5장 제2절(意思表示)의 규정들의 개정
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 미국 불법행위 법리에서의 안전벨트 항변
- 附錄
- 해상화물운송장에 대한 법적고찰
- 교회의 분열과 재산귀속에 관한 판례법리의 변천 - 대상판결 : 대법원 2006. 4. 20. 선고 2004다37775 전원합의체 판결
- 해지환급금청구를 위한 제3채권자의 보험계약해지
- 착오규정의 개정시안에 따른 비정상적인 의사표시의 체계변화 및 농담으로 한 의사표시의 취급
- 미국계약법의 구조와 이해
- 意思表示의 主觀的 構成要素
- 저작인접권자의 공연권 도입 여부에 대한 고찰 - 음반제작자를 중심으로
- 미국계약법연구서설 - 그 구조와 현대적 의의
- 의사의 설명의무에 관한 최근 판례의 동향과 그 비판적 고찰
- 民法 總則編 제5장(법률행위) 제1절(총칙)과 제2절(의사표시)에 관한 개정방향
- 영미법상 Consideration 법리와 계약의 쌍무성
- 민법 제393조와 불법행위법에서의 예견가능성
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 법학분야 BEST
- 인공지능 판사, 과연 가능한가?
- 정치의 사법화와 사법의 정치화 : 온건하고 실용적인 헌법재판의 당위성
- 자국 우선주의 정책과 국제법상 난민⋅이민자 보호-트럼프 행정부의 미국 우선주의를 중심으로-
법학 > 법학분야 NEW
더보기최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
