공직가치 인식과 공공봉사동기가 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 절차·분배 공정성의 조절효과

• 영문명: Public Service Values and Motivation as Predictors of Two‑Dimensional Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Roles of Procedural and Distributive Justice
• 발행기관: 한국비교정부학회
• 저자명: 박채정(Chaejeong Park) 최한별(Hanbyul Choi)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국비교정부학보』제29권 제3호, 255~294쪽, 전체 40쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 행정학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2025.09.30

국문 초록

(Purpose) This study examines how public service values and public service motivation (PSM) shape individual‑level innovative behavior in public organizations, distinguishing a two‑dimensional outcome: proactive(motive) behavior and silence(acquiescent/defensive). We also test whether organizational justice—procedural and distributive—conditions these relationships. (Design/methodology/approach) Using the 2024 Korea Institute of Public Administration Civil Service Life Survey (n = 6,075), we estimate stepwise OLS models with robust standard errors and mean‑centered continuous predictors, controlling for agency type, gender, age, education, tenure, entry type, and rank. (Findings) Findings are as follows. First, for proactive behavior, democratic, professional, and ethical values show significant positive associations. All four PSM facets—attraction to policy making, self‑sacrifice, compassion, and commitment to the public interest—are also positively related. Procedural justice exhibits a positive main effect, whereas distributive justice is not significant. In moderation tests, procedural justice amplifies the effect of democratic values but attenuates the effect of professional values; distributive justice strengthens the effect of ethical values while weakening that of professional values. Second, for silence, democratic values and two PSM facets (commitment to the public interest, attraction to policy making) are associated with lower silence. Procedural justice is the strongest suppressor of silence, while distributive justice is modestly associated with higher silence. Moderation patterns indicate that procedural justice strengthens the “values → lower silence” pathway for professional and humanistic values but weakens it for democratic values; distributive justice similarly strengthens suppression of silence for professional and humanistic values while attenuating it for democratic values. (Research implications or Originality) Overall, the study demonstrates asymmetric effects of the same predictors across the two dimensions of innovative behavior, highlights the centrality of democratic values, and documents the dual role of procedural justice as both a direct driver and a contextual moderator.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 이론적 배경

Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 방법

Ⅳ. 분석 결과

Ⅴ. 결론

References

키워드

혁신행동 공직가치 인식 공공봉사동기 조직공정성 Innovative Behavior Public Service Values Public Service Motivation Organizational Justice

참고문헌

• Administrative Sciences
• The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
• Advances in experimental social psychology
• Innovation: A cross-disciplinary perspective
• Organization Science
• The Journal of Korean Policy Studies
• Korean Public Administration Review
• Korean Public Personnel Administration Review
• Korean Public Administration Quarterly
• Korean Public Personnel Administration Review
• Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance
• Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies
• The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies
• The Korean Journal of Public Administration
• Korean Public Administration Review
• Journal of Applied Psychology
• Academy of Management Journal
• Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management
• Creativity and Innovation Management
• Journal of Management Studies
• Annual Review of Sociology
• Academy of Management Journal
• The Journal of Korean Policy Studies
• Academy of Management Review
• Korean Local Administration Review
• Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
• Journal of Policy Development
• Korean Public Administration Quarterly
• Korean Review of Organizational Studies
• The Korean Journal of Public Administration
• Public Administration Review
• Korean Public Personnel Administration Review
• Journal of Organization and Management
• The Korean Governance Review
• Korean Public Personnel Administration Review
• Korean Society and Public Administration
• Korean Journal of Public Administration
• Korean Journal of Public Administration
• Research in the Sociology of Organizations
• Journal of Organization and Management
• Korean Society and Public Administration
• The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies
• Korean Public Administration Review
• Journal of Social Science
• Korean Public Personnel Administration Review
• Korean Local Administration Review
• Korean Public Personnel Administration Review
• Journal of Governmental Studies(JGS)
• Social exchange Advances in theory and research
• Academy of Management Journal
• Korean Society and Public Administration
• Academy of Management Annals
• Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol
• Academy of Management Review
• The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies
• Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
• Public Administration Review
• Research in personnel and human resources management
• Review of Public Personnel Administration
• Korean Public Administration Quarterly
• Korean Public Administration Review
• Academy of Management Journal
• Korean Public Administration Review
• Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
• Korean Public Administration Quarterly
• Strategic Management Journal
• Management Science
• Social Behaviour
• Electronic Markets
• Public Administration
• Modern Society and Public Administration