Limitations of the Support System for Legal Commercial Districts and the Direction of Change in Policy for Local Commercial Districts : Based on a Korea-Japan Comparison
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
1:1 문의
국문 초록
This study aims to examine the status and functions of the statutory commercial district system, established under the Traditional Market Promotion Act, within the context of Local commercial district support policies. It also seeks to identify the legal and policy-related challenges surrounding the system and propose directions for future improvement. The analysis is grounded in empirical data and policy cases, focusing on issues such as the declining industrial status of traditional markets, changes in the distribution market structure, shifting consumer perceptions, overlaps and inconsistencies among relevant laws, and the adverse effects of excessive support concentrated on statutory commercial districts. In particular, the study draws comparative insights from Japan’s Central City Revitalization Policy and private sector-led commercial district management models, in order to suggest a new paradigm for Local commercial district support. Ultimately, the paper emphasizes the need for a policy and institutional shift from “special support focused on statutory commercial districts” toward a “universal support system for all commercial districts.”
영문 초록
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Theoretical Consideration
Ⅲ. The Structural and Industrial Status of the Legal Commercial District System
Ⅳ. The Institutional Structure and Change of Korea-Japan Local Commercial Policy
Ki-Dong SHIN,Tae-Chang RYU. (2025).Limitations of the Support System for Legal Commercial Districts and the Direction of Change in Policy for Local Commercial Districts : Based on a Korea-Japan Comparison. 주거환경(한국주거환경학회논문집), 23 (3), 227-246
MLA
Ki-Dong SHIN,Tae-Chang RYU. "Limitations of the Support System for Legal Commercial Districts and the Direction of Change in Policy for Local Commercial Districts : Based on a Korea-Japan Comparison." 주거환경(한국주거환경학회논문집), 23.3(2025): 227-246