创新还是误解：柄谷行人对《资本论》中价值理论的解读辨析

• 영문명: Innovation or Misunderstanding: Differentiate and Analyses of the Interpretation of the Value Theory in Das Kapital by Kojin Karatani
• 발행기관: YIXIN 출판사
• 저자명: Zhang Bohan
• 간행물 정보: 『International journal of Marxism studies』Vol.2 No.2, 26~34쪽, 전체 9쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2025.06.30

국문 초록

In his representative work Transcritique, Japanese scholar Kojin Karatani interprets the value theory in Capital using Kant’s “parallax” category and his original “Critique of Transcendence” paradigm. He emphasized the importance of the theory of value forms for the development process and theoretical content of Marx’s economic thought, proposing that surplus value does not come from production but from exchange. By analyzing his viewpoint, it can be seen that the interpretation of Kojin Karatani is actually a misreading, which arbitrarily cuts and distorts Marx’s original intention, obscuring the exploitative nature of the capitalist mode of production; His approach reflects his concern for the times and problem awareness, but there are also areas that can be debated.

영문 초록

日本学者柄谷行人在其代表作《跨越性批判》中，从康德的“视差”范畴出发，以独创的“跨越性批判”范式解读《资本论》中的价值理论。他强调价值形式理论对于马克思经济思想发展过程和理论内容的重要意义，提出剩余价值不是来自生产而是交换。对其观点进行辨析，可知柄谷行人的解读实为误读，存在对马克思本意的任意裁剪和扭曲，遮蔽了资本主义生产方式的剥削本质，他的方法体现了其时代关怀和问题意识，但也存在可商榷之处。

목차

Ⅰ. 引言

Ⅱ. “跨越性批判”——一种解读范式

Ⅲ. 柄谷对《资本论》中价值理论的“创新性”解读

Ⅳ. 对《资本论》“柄谷式解读”的辨析

Ⅴ. 结语

参考文献

키워드

Kojin Karatani Transcritique Das Kapital Surplus value Surplus value theory 柄谷行人 《跨越性批判》 《资本论》 剩余价值理论