中国外国法律查明制度效果之发展与完善研究

• 영문명: The Development and Improvement of the Effectiveness of China’s Foreign Law Ascertainment System
• 발행기관: YIXIN 출판사
• 저자명: Hu Shudi
• 간행물 정보: 『Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences』Vol.3 No.3, 121~130쪽, 전체 10쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2025.06.30

국문 초록

China has issued new judicial interpretations on foreign law ascertainment, addressing the shortcomings of the previous system with more specific provisions. Issues in the judicial practice of foreign law ascertainment are expected to be partially resolved following the implementation of these new interpretations, thereby enhancing the practical effectiveness of China’s foreign law ascertainment system. However, there remain areas for improvement in the specific operations, such as the ascertainment responsibilities of arbitration institutions and administrative agencies, the criteria for determining when foreign law cannot be ascertained, the admissibility of foreign law ascertainment methods, and judges’ tendency to apply Chinese law. To address these, it is necessary to clarify the ascertainment responsibilities of arbitration institutions and administrative agencies, establish a logical framework for the criteria of “inability to ascertain”, improve issues related to foreign law ascertainment methods, adopt measures to encourage judges to apply foreign law, and strengthen the training of specialized personnel. These steps aim to further enhance the effectiveness of China’s foreign law ascertainment system under the new judicial interpretations.

영문 초록

中国关于外国法查明颁布了新的司法解释，回应了此前外国法查明制度存在的不足，作出了更为具体的规定。此前外国法查明的司法实践中的问题，在新的司法解释实施后会得到一定的解决，以增强中国外国法查明制度的实际效果。但我国外国法查明具体操作时尚存在需要进步和完善的地方，如仲裁机构和行政机关的查明主体、不能查明认定标准以及外国法查明途径可采性、法官适用中国法的选法倾向等问题。对此，应当明确仲裁机构与行政机关的查明责任，厘清不能查明的认定标准的逻辑框架、完善外国法查明途径相关问题,采取措施激励法官适用外国法、加强专门人才培养，以求在新的司法解释之下进一步发挥我国的外国法查明制度的实效。

목차

Ⅰ. 引言

Ⅱ. 外国法查明制度现状考察

Ⅲ. 外国法查明发挥效果之困境

Ⅳ. 外国法查明制度完善建议

Ⅴ. 结语

参考文献

키워드

Foreign Law Ascertainment Ascertainment Responsibility Ascertainment Methods 外国法查明 查明责任 查明途径