比较研究视野下国共浙东地区的“二五减租”

• 영문명: A Comparative Study of the “25% Rent Reduction” Policy Implemented by the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China in the Eastern Zhejiang Region
• 발행기관: YIXIN 출판사
• 저자명: Li Pingfan
• 간행물 정보: 『Journal of Chinese Marxism studies』Vol.2 No.4, 51~63쪽, 전체 13쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2025.04.30

국문 초록

Both the Kuomintang (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) implemented the “25% Rent Reduction Movement” in Zhejiang Province. While Zhejiang held representative significance in the KMT’s rent reduction history, its policy ultimately stagnated into a semi-defunct state. In contrast, the CPC vigorously executed this movement in its anti-Japanese base areas . The underlying reasons for this divergence warrant thorough investigation. Through comparative research and documentary analysis, this study outlines the socio-ecological conditions and implementation processes of rent reduction policies by both parties in Zhejiang. The comparison reveals substantial differences in three key aspects: flexibility in rent quota formulation, scope of rent reduction coverage, and approaches to resolving tenant-landlord disputes. Fundamentally, the KMT regime relied on gentry-landlords to maintain local governance, rendering it incapable of fundamentally dismantling the feudal land tenure system. Although the KMT’s achievements in rent reduction proved inferior to the CPC’s, its earlier implementation of the 25% Rent Reduction Movement nonetheless yielded valuable historical lessons.

영문 초록

国共两党均在浙江开展过“二五减租”运动，且浙省在国民党二五减租史上极具代表性，可最终完全进入“半生半死状态”，而中共在敌后抗日根据地却将“二五减租”实施得如火如荼，其差距的个中缘由值得我们深入探究。通过比较研究法和文献分析法，概括出国共双方在浙省开展二五减租的社会生态以及具体实施情形，将两者二五减租政策和实践过程进行对比，总结出国共双方在订立缴租额的灵活性、减租范围以及处理佃业纠纷案件态度等方面极具差异。究其根本，国民党政权依赖地主士绅维持基层统治，无法彻底打破封建土地制度，改革并未触动社会秩序。虽国民党所取得的减租成效不及中共，但国民党此前所开展的二五减租运动也为提供了不菲的经验教训。

목차

Ⅰ. 引言

Ⅱ. 国共两党开展二五减租的社会生态

Ⅲ. 国共两党在浙东实施“二五减租”的具体情形

Ⅳ. 关于国共两党实施“二五减租”的比较性评析

Ⅴ. 结语

키워드

Rent reduction The Kuomintang The Communist Party of China Zhejiang Province 二五减租 国民党 中国共产党 浙江省