본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

한국어 교사의 쓰기 평가 문식성 연구

이용수 12

영문명
A Study on Writing Assessment Literacy of Korean Teachers
발행기관
이중언어학회
저자명
전형길 이인혜
간행물 정보
『이중언어학』제69호, 213~248쪽, 전체 36쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 언어학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2017.12.31
이용가능 이용불가
  • sam무제한 이용권 으로 학술논문 이용이 가능합니다.
  • 이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다. 1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In this paper, we inspect the effects and aspects of writing assessment literacy on writing assessment through a think-out-loud protocol and interviews, focusing on the knowledge and beliefs of evaluators. First, in terms of ‘knowledge’, evaluators show the mental representation of the evaluation criteria by using knowledge as an evaluator. In addition, they are aware of their assessment characteristics and try to control their strictness based on the knowledge through evaluator training experience and research. The evaluators show that they try to establish the internal criterion by themselves in the assessment situation where no evaluator training and discussion exists. Even though the analytical scoring method was given, the raters also used the holistic scoring method as a supplement. In addition, the evaluators show the social interaction that understand the context that the author intends based on writing without meeting student authors by exploiting the knowledge as a teacher who teaches Korean. Evaluators differed in proficiency in score representation because of their teaching experience and grader training. In terms of language use, experienced evaluators do more automated score representation than inexperienced evaluators. Next, from the perspective of ‘beliefs’, the difference between the evaluators was more prominent than the knowledge aspects. Especially, it is confirmed that the difference of beliefs of Korean writing for academic purposes evaluation constructs and L2 writing evaluation is represented as different text images and score representations. In addition, the evaluators generally agree that L1 literacy and L2 literacy is not fixed and influences each other. However, the difference in beliefs about the construct of writing for academic purposes results in differences in task performance and content criteria.

목차

1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
3. 연구 방법
4. 평가 과정에 나타난 평가 문식성
5. 결론
참고 문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

전형길,이인혜. (2017).한국어 교사의 쓰기 평가 문식성 연구. 이중언어학, (), 213-248

MLA

전형길,이인혜. "한국어 교사의 쓰기 평가 문식성 연구." 이중언어학, (2017): 213-248

sam 이용권 선택
님이 보유하신 이용권입니다.
차감하실 sam이용권을 선택하세요.