진술증거의 전문증거성과 진정성 문제의 구별

• 영문명: The Difference of the Elements of the Hearsay Rule From Those of the Authentication.
• 발행기관: 한국형사판례연구회
• 저자명: 이완규(Wankyu Lee)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사판례연구』형사판례연구 제20권, 527~559쪽, 전체 33쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.06.30

영문 초록

Introducing hearsay rule in 1961, the words of provisions that provide the authentication and attendance of the declarant as exceptions of principle of the court s self-experience, were used as exceptions of the hearsay rule. It results in confusion of the elements of the hearsay rule with the elements of the authentication in the jurisprudence. Many literatures insist and place emphasis on the elements of the authentication as the elements of exceptions of the hearsay rule. With this confusion and misunderstanding, it became very difficult to understand the hearsay rule and many improper interpretations result from this confusion. In the future, the discussion which distinguish the elements of the hearsay rule from the elements of the authentication should be made actively and lead the academy and practice.

목차

Ⅰ.서

Ⅱ. 진술증거의 전문증거성과 증거의 진정성

Ⅲ. 전문증거와 증명, 진정성 문제의 관계

Ⅳ. 진술녹음의 경우

Ⅴ. 판례에 대한 평가

Ⅵ. 결어

키워드

진술증거 전문증거 진정성 특신정황 녹음진술 statements evidence hearsay authentication situation of guarantees of trustworthiness sound recorded statements